Core Philosophy: Why This Sector?
All analysis begins with "why":
| Question | Role |
|---|---|
| Why is this sector growing? | Source of demand (policy/technology/consumption changes) |
| Why now? | Tipping point, catalyst event |
| Why these companies? | Core nodes in the value chain + dominant companies |
Two Approaches
A. RSI Screening (Number-based)
Process:
RSI 70+ 종목 필터링 → 섹터 클러스터링 → 왜 이 섹터에 자금 집중? → 심층 분석
RSI (Relative Strength Index): Based on 14 days, 70 or above indicates strong upward momentum
Interpretation Caution:
- RSI 70+ = unconditionally overheated ❌
- RSI 70+ = signal to investigate "why money is flowing in" ✅
B. Narrative-based (Policy/Theme)
Process:
테마 선정 → 밸류 체인 매핑 → 핵심 노드 식별 → 노드별 지배 기업 → 분석 실행
Policy Driver Examples:
| Policy | Beneficiary Sector | Key Question |
|---|---|---|
| CHIPS Act | Semiconductor manufacturing, equipment | Who benefits from fab construction in the U.S.? |
| IRA | Clean energy, EV | Which companies meet the tax credit requirements? |
| America First | Defense, infrastructure | Who benefits most from reshoring? |
Future Industry Themes:
| Theme | Value Chain Core Nodes |
|---|---|
| AI | GPU design, foundry, HBM memory |
| Autonomous driving | Sensors (LiDAR), software, semiconductors |
| Robotics | Actuators, sensors, AI chips |
| Space | Launch vehicles, satellites, ground infrastructure |
| Energy | SMR, grid, ESS |
Sector Analysis Process
Step 1: Theme/Policy Starting Point
Verification Questions:
- What is the budget size? When is the implementation date?
- What are the benefit conditions? (e.g., IRA tax credit requirements)
- Will this trend still be valid in 5 years?
Step 2: Value Chain Mapping
Example — AI Theme:
[설계/IP] → [제조] → [패키징] → [메모리] → [시스템] → [클라우드] → [앱]
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
NVIDIA TSMC Amkor SK하이닉스 Dell AWS OpenAI
AMD 삼성 ASE Micron Supermicro Azure Anthropic
ARM HPE GCP
Example — Semiconductor Reshoring (CHIPS Act):
[팹 건설] → [장비] → [소재] → [제조] → [후공정]
│ │ │ │ │
건설사 ASML Entegris Intel Amkor
AMAT Linde TSMC(AZ)
Lam Air Liquide
KLA
Step 3: Core Node Identification
Evaluation Criteria (0-3 points each):
| Criterion | Question |
|---|---|
| Bottleneck | If this node is blocked, does the entire chain stop? |
| Irreplaceable | Difficult to replace with another player? |
| Margin concentration | Are profits concentrated here? |
| Leverage | Biggest beneficiary when the theme grows? |
8 points or more = core node ⭐
Example — AI value chain:
| Node | Bottleneck | Irreplaceable | Margin | Leverage | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU design | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 ⭐ |
| Foundry | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 ⭐ |
| HBM memory | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 ⭐ |
| Cloud | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
Step 4: Selecting the dominant company for each node
Selection criteria:
- No. 1-2 in market share
- Technology leadership (leading next-generation technology)
- Financial soundness (capacity to invest)
- Vertical integration (additional dominance within the value chain)
Step 5: Determining analysis priorities
핵심 노드 일반 노드
┌─────────────┬─────────────┐
1위 기업 │ 🔴 필수 │ 🟡 권장 │
├─────────────┼─────────────┤
2위 기업 │ 🟡 권장 │ 🟢 선택 │
├─────────────┼─────────────┤
3위 이하 │ 🟢 선택 │ ⚪ 제외 │
└─────────────┴─────────────┘
Sector analysis report structure
1. Executive Summary
- One-sentence sector definition: "[Sector] is an industry that solves [problem]"
- Why this sector now? (Catalyst)
- Key investment thesis
2. Source of demand: Why is this sector growing? ⭐ Core
Must start with "Why":
- What problem is being solved?
- Among policy/technology/consumption changes, which is the driver?
- Distinguishing temporary vs structural growth
예시 — 반도체 장비:
문제: 미국 반도체 자급률 12%, 지정학 리스크
정책: CHIPS Act $527억 + 25% 세액공제
결과: 미국 내 팹 건설 붐 → 장비 수요 폭발
구조적?: Yes, 공급망 안보는 장기 트렌드
3. Industry structure
3.1 Value chain map — visualization required 3.2 Competitive intensity (Porter's 5 Forces summary) 3.3 Entry barriers
4. Key player analysis
| Company | Node | Market share | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASML | Equipment (EUV) | 100% | Monopoly | Geopolitics |
| AMAT | Equipment (deposition) | 20% | Diversification | Competition |
Positioning map (2x2 matrix) recommended
5. Growth drivers and risks
- 5.1 Bull scenario: What needs to go well?
- 5.2 Bear scenario: What could go wrong?
6. Regulatory environment
- Current regulations
- Expected changes
7. Investment implications
Result of selecting companies to analyze:
| Priority | Node | Company | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Required | GPU design | NVIDIA | Core node + No. 1 |
| 🔴 Required | Foundry | TSMC | Core node + monopoly |
| 🟡 Recommended | HBM | SK hynix | Core node + No. 1 |
→ For individual company analysis, use the company-research-report skill
8. Glossary
9. Disclaimer and sources
Technical term explanation rules
Three-tier explanation system (same as company-research-report):
- Immediate explanation: definition in parentheses
- Contextual explanation: explain what the numbers mean
- Glossary: compiled at the end of the report
Workflow
테마 선정 → 밸류 체인 매핑 → 핵심 노드 식별 → 지배 기업 선정 → 보고서 작성
│
└→ (RSI 스크리닝 시) 강세 종목 → 섹터 클러스터링 → 왜? → 위 프로세스
Critical Issues
| ID | Violation |
|---|---|
| C1 | Missing "Why" — Sector description without the source of demand |
| C2 | Missing value chain map |
| C3 | Listing companies without evaluation criteria for key nodes |
| C4 | Listing numbers without a narrative |
| C5 | Missing terminology explanations |
Reference files
references/valuation_chain_examples.md— Value chain examples by themereferences/policy_tracker.md— Summary of key policy drivers