When writing articles, avoid AI's canned flavor; when detecting articles, catch the traces of AI generation.
Trigger Timing
- The user asks to write an article, blog post, or column
- The user asks to detect/analyze whether a piece of text reads like it was written by AI
- The user says "help me write it with more of a human touch"
Mode One: Writing Assistance
When writing, proactively avoid these AI-flavored sentence patterns:
Banned List
| Type | Banned Sentence Patterns |
|---|---|
| Fake turn | It's not... but rather..., not only... but also... |
| Risk buffering | To some extent, one could say, in a certain sense |
| Fake depth | However, we must also be aware that, the key lies in, this means |
| Canned ending | In conclusion, in summary, let us look forward together, it requires our joint effort |
| Empty embellishment | Multidimensional, far-reaching impact, empower, paradigm shift, the importance that cannot be ignored |
| Neutral waffle | This is a question worth pondering, everyone may have different views, it depends on many factors |
Alternative Strategies
-
Replace abstraction with specifics
- Bad: "Failure is the mother of success"
- Good: "The day my startup failed, I hid in a convenience store eating a cold rice ball, tears falling on the wrapper"
-
Dare to take a side and have a stance
- Bad: "There are pros and cons to this matter, and we should stay rational"
- Good: "I think this is simply sabotage, there's no second interpretation"
-
Use everyday metaphors
- Bad: "This code is logically chaotic"
- Good: "This code is as messy as that pile of earphones at my place that I can never untangle"
-
Allow uncertainty
- Bad: "This phenomenon deserves our deep thought"
- Good: "Honestly, I still haven't fully figured this out"
-
Allow contradiction and change
- Good: "I used to hate this way of saying it, but later I found out I was wrong"
-
Endings can be left hanging
- No need to summarize, just stop when you have nothing left to say
- A good ending: "Even now, I'm still not sure whether this is a good thing"
Must-Ask Before Writing
Ask the user for:
- Your personal experience or story?
- Your true stance on this matter? (Not an "objective view")
- Are there any everyday metaphors you can use?
Mode Two: AI Flavor Detection
When analyzing an article, check three core questions:
Detection Checklist
| Question | AI-flavor indicator | Human-flavor indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Specificity | No time, place, people, or numbers | Has specific details and scene descriptions |
| Emotional feel | Every sentence smooth, perfectly balanced | Has sentences that are not quite smooth but real, with obvious emotion |
| Stance-taking | Trying to please both sides, afraid to take a stance | Clear stance, unique viewpoint, willing to offend people |
Detect output format
## AI 味檢測報告
**AI 味指數**: X/10（10 = 純 AI 味）
### 發現的 AI 句型
- [引用原文] → 問題：[說明]
### 缺少的人味元素
- [ ] 具體時間/地點/人物/數字
- [ ] 個人經驗或故事
- [ ] 明確立場
- [ ] 生活化譬喻
- [ ] 情緒表達
### 改寫建議
[針對最嚴重的 2-3 處給具體改法]
Note
- The "appearance" of these sentence patterns does not necessarily mean it was written by AI; humans use them too
- The key is "density": these sentence patterns appear densely in AI articles
- Human articles have "bumps, dents, obsessions, and flaws"; these are features, not shortcomings