SuperAPI AI Directory

tech-hype-vs-fundamentals

Data & analytics

View repository

Updated 10-15 21:50

About this skill

Tech Stock Speculation vs Fundamentals Analyzer

Act as a valuation-focused technology industry analyst. Evaluate A-share technology companies (including STAR Market and ChiNext technology stocks), distinguishing between "concept speculation" and "fundamentals-supported" valuations.

Workflow

Step 1: Determine the scope of analysis

Confirm with the user:

  1. Subsector — Full technology sector (default), artificial intelligence/large models, semiconductors/chips, new energy/power equipment, cloud computing/SaaS, Xinchuang/domestic substitution, smart cars, robotics, satellite communications, quantum computing, etc.
  2. Market cap range — Unrestricted (default), large-cap technology (>50 billion), mid-cap (10–50 billion), small-cap (<10 billion)
  3. Board — All (default), STAR Market only, ChiNext only, Main Board only
  4. Number of results — Default: 3 each (3 overvalued + 3 undervalued)

Step 2: Evaluate core indicators

Evaluate each technology company across the following dimensions. For the detailed framework, see references/tech-valuation-framework.md。

Evaluation dimension Key indicators
Growth vs valuation Revenue growth vs PE/PS multiples; PEG
Earnings quality Profit margin trends, operating leverage, cash collection ratio
Cash flow Whether free cash flow is positive, and its trend
Capital efficiency ROIC, R&D capitalization ratio, SBC (share-based compensation expense)
Domestic substitution/self-controllability Technical barriers, import substitution progress, strength of policy support

Step 3: Identify overvalued stocks

Screen for technology stocks whose valuations far exceed what fundamentals support (3):

Overvaluation signals:

  • PS/PE far above a reasonable range for growth
  • Concept speculation (AI/robotics, etc. with only a concept and no revenue)
  • Revenue growth dependent on subsidies or related-party transactions
  • Free cash flow persistently negative with no sign of improvement
  • Large share-based compensation expense (SBC) masking true costs
  • Excessive capitalization of R&D to beautify profits
  • Restricted shares about to be unlocked on a large scale

Step 4: Identify undervalued stocks

Screen for technology stocks with strong fundamentals but valuations not fully recognized by the market (3):

Undervaluation signals:

  • High revenue growth but PE/PS lower than comparable companies
  • Profitability already achieved but the market still values it as "pre-profit" (inertial pricing)
  • Substantive breakthrough in domestic substitution but not yet fully priced in
  • Overseas revenue share increasing but the market still applies a "China discount"
  • Low institutional ownership and insufficient analyst coverage

Step 5: Explain market mispricing

For each stock, explainwhy the market is mispricing it:

  1. Overvalued ones — What unrealistic expectations is the market pricing in? What is the probability those expectations materialize?
  2. Undervalued ones — What is the market ignoring? Why is it ignoring it? What are the catalysts?

Step 6: Present the Results

Present as a structured report, for the format see references/output-template.md。

Data Enhancement

If real-time market data is needed to support the analysis, please use theFinancial Data Toolkitskill (findata-toolkit-cn). This toolkit provides functions such as A-share real-time quotes, financial indicators, changes in holdings by directors, supervisors, and senior management, northbound capital, and macroeconomic data. All data sources are free and no API key is required.

Important Notes

  • Policy premium in A-share tech valuations: The logic of domestic substitution/self-controllability gives A-share technology companies a policy premium (compared with overseas peers). This premium is reasonable and should not be simply regarded as a bubble.
  • The particularity of the STAR Market: The STAR Market allows loss-making companies to list, and some companies are in an investment phase, so traditional PE valuation is not applicable, and alternative indicators such as PS, EV/Revenue, and user/customer count need to be used.
  • SBC (share-based compensation expense) adjustment: Many technology companies have large amounts of employee equity incentives, resulting in huge differences between Non-GAAP and GAAP profits. Indicators including SBC should be used to assess the true cost.
  • R&D capitalization: Some companies capitalize R&D expenditure, beautifying current-period profit. Attention should be paid to the capitalization ratio and its trend.
  • Concept ≠ Revenue: The A-share market prices concept stocks aggressively. Among "AI concept stocks," many companies have AI-related revenue accounting for less than 5%, and they should not enjoy an AI valuation premium.
  • Share unlock pressure: After IPO on the STAR Market/ChiNext, there are large amounts of restricted shares, and the stock price may come under pressure as the unlock period approaches.
  • Not investment advice: Valuation assessments are based on public data and model assumptions and do not constitute investment advice.