Before executing the specific method, read Craft scenario commands and parameters, and execute according to the object selection, session, input replacement, and result checking described therein.
Task starting point
First read the source material and confirm the delivery purpose, target size or duration, scope of changes, and required format. Directly adopt reasonable defaults for details that can be determined from the task and source material; only ask about missing conditions that would change the result.
When a visible editor is needed, hand off to the wordcraft-editor skill. Standalone installation:npx skills add full-aigc-skills/wordcraft-skills --skill wordcraft-editor. The currently added skill is a local candidate; before release, use the local companion plugin, and do not treat this installation command as proof of publication.
Execution steps
- Determine the problem, material scope, and citation method.
- Establish the structure of abstract, body, methods, conclusion, and appendix.
- Set titles and numbers for figures and tables, and cite traceable sources.
- Check the table of contents, cross-references, and pagination.
Tool implementation
Use open_document/new_document to manage documents; use get_text for verification, type_text for input, and other edits according to the live tool list; use save_document to save, and render_page to check layout.
First read the actual tool schema, then fill in parameters; use returned values for object or document IDs. Queried commands must be available in the current backend. Before saving, choose a new output path and preserve the input. If a required algorithm, format, or command does not exist, state the gap; do not pass off a similar name as the real thing.
Result checking
- Conclusions have corresponding evidence.
- Reference sources are not fabricated, and citations are not misattributed.
- After export, figures/tables, footnotes, and page numbers are readable.
Check the actual content against the user's goals, not just the process exit code. For local edits, inspect local details; for layout tasks, inspect the full page; for time-based media, inspect the start, end, and key segments. For abnormal results, first check the current project to avoid repeatedly performing irreversible operations.
Delivery
Return the editable project, the actual derived files, and a brief explanation: what changes were made, which steps were not executed due to current capabilities, and what the user needs to judge. List only files that actually exist and have been checked. If the user later requests rework, read this source project and make local modifications, preserving accepted content.