SuperAPI AI Directory

data-storytelling

Data & analytics

View repository

Updated 10-15 21:40

About this skill

Data Storytelling
Property Value
Domain Data Analytics
Category Narrative & Orchestration
Trifecta SKILL.md + data-storytelling.instructions.md + datastory.prompt.md
Depends data-analysis (findings), data-visualization (charts), dashboard-design (layout)

Overview

This is the orchestrator skill. It transforms raw data into a complete, coherent narrative by activating analysis, visualization, and dashboard skills in sequence. The output is a self-contained artifact -- typically an HTML dashboard or scrollable report -- where every chart, annotation, and KPI serves the story.

The cardinal rule: data stories have arguments, not just observations. A collection of charts with captions is a report. A data story says "here's what happened, here's why it matters, and here's what we should do."

Module 1: Three-Act Data Structure

Every data story follows this arc:

Act Purpose Content
Setup Establish context and baseline Who, what, when, where + "here's how things were"
Conflict Reveal the surprise, problem, or gap "But then this happened" / "X is not what we expected"
Resolution Deliver insight and recommendation "This means X, and we should do Y"

Act Mapping to Dashboard Components

Act Dashboard Element
Setup KPI cards showing baseline stats
Conflict Hero chart revealing the anomaly
Resolution Supporting charts + annotated insight

Module 2: Audience-First Framing

Before choosing a single chart, identify who will read this and what decision it supports.

Audience Time Budget What They Need Artifact Style
Executive 30 seconds Headline + action recommendation KPI dashboard, 5-Visual
Manager 2 minutes Context + options + trade-offs Dashboard with filters
Analyst Unlimited Full data + methodology + caveats Detailed report with drill
General 1 minute Simple story, familiar visuals Scroll narrative, annotated

Module 3: Knaflic Method ("Storytelling with Data")

The 5-step framework from Cole Nussbaumer Knaflic:

Step Action
1. Understand context Who is the audience? What do they need to do?
2. Choose an effective visual Story intent → chart type (SKILL cross-ref)
3. Eliminate clutter Remove everything that isn't data or supporting story
4. Focus attention Use color, size, position to direct the eye
5. Tell a story Connect visuals with narrative text

Module 4: Duarte Contrast ("What Is" vs. "What Could Be")

Nancy Duarte's tension pattern drives engagement:

What Is:      "Today, we process 500 support tickets per day"
What Could Be: "With the new model, we could process 2000 with the same team"
What Is:      "Current SLA breach rate is 12%"
What Could Be: "Top performers achieve 3% -- the gap is process, not people"

Use this pattern when the story needs to motivate action, not just inform.

Module 5: Big Idea Worksheet

Force the story into one sentence before building anything:

[Subject/audience] should [action/decision]
because [evidence from data].

Examples:

  • "The exec team should double Q4 marketing spend because every $1 of email marketing generates $3.20 in pipeline"
  • "Engineering should prioritize Region B support because resolution time is 2.5x the company average"

If you can't write the Big Idea sentence, the analysis isn't done yet.

Module 6: Explanatory vs. Exploratory

Mode You Know the Story? Goal Output
Explanatory Yes Guide viewer to a conclusion Annotated dashboard/report
Exploratory No (yet) Let viewer discover patterns Interactive dashboard

Default to explanatory for executives and general audiences. Use exploratory for analysts.

Module 7: Annotation as Narration

Annotations carry the argument. The chart is evidence; the annotation is the lawyer.

Annotation Type Purpose Example
Title State the insight (not the metric) "Revenue grew 34% but growth is slowing"
Subtitle Provide context "Quarterly actuals, FY2024-FY2025"
Callout Highlight the key data point Arrow + "Q3 peak: $4.2M"
Caption Add nuance below the chart "Note: Q1 2025 includes one-time adjustment"
Footnote Source, methodology, caveats "Source: Internal CRM, excludes returns"

Module 8: Orchestration Protocol

When /datastory is invoked, execute these phases in order:

Phase 0: Ingest

  • Activate data-ingest.cjs (or inline parse)
  • Output: clean columnar data + metadata

Phase 1: Discover

  • Activate data-analysis skill
  • Output: 3-5 insight statements with story intents

Phase 2: Visualize

  • Activate data-visualization skill for each insight
  • Match story intent → chart type
  • Output: chart specs with titles-as-insights

Phase 3: Arrange

  • Activate dashboard-design skill
  • Choose layout by audience
  • Place KPIs, hero, supporting, table, drill-down
  • Output: dashboard scaffold

Phase 4: Narrate

  • Apply three-act structure
  • Write Big Idea sentence
  • Add annotations as narration
  • Validate: top-to-bottom read tells the story
  • Output: self-contained HTML with narrative

Module 9: Quality Checks

Before delivering the final output:

Check Pass Criteria
Big Idea exists One sentence captures the entire story
Three-act present Setup → Conflict → Resolution identifiable
Titles are insights No chart titled "Revenue by Quarter" (must be a sentence)
Color consistency Same category = same color across all visuals
Source attribution Every chart cites its data source
Audience match Executive gets 5 visuals, analyst gets drill-down
3-second test Each chart conveys its point in 3 seconds
Annotation coverage Hero chart has at least 1 callout annotation
Data freshness Date range stated; "as of" timestamp included

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern Problem Fix
Chart collection Charts exist but don't connect Apply three-act structure
Data dump Every metric shown "just in case" Write Big Idea first, cut everything else
Insight-free annotations "This is a bar chart showing revenue" State what the data means, not what it is
Wrong audience depth Analyst-level detail for C-suite Match artifact to audience time budget
No recommendation Story ends at "here's what happened" Always include "so here's what we should do"
Over-designed Fancy visuals, weak argument Substance over aesthetics