clean-names

Clean Names

N1: Choose Descriptive Names

Names should reveal intent. If a name requires a comment, it doesn't reveal its intent.

// Bad - what is d?
const d = 86400;

// Good - obvious meaning
const SECONDS_PER_DAY = 86400;

// Bad - what does this function do?
function proc(values: number[]) {
  return values.filter((value) => value > 0);
}

// Good - intent is clear function filterPositiveNumbers(numbers: number[]) { return numbers.filter((number) => number > 0); }

## N2: Choose Names at the Appropriate Level of Abstraction

Don't pick names that communicate implementation; choose names that reflect the level of abstraction of the class or function.

```ts
// Bad - too implementation-specific
function getMapOfUserIdsToNames() {
  // ...
}

// Good - abstracts the data structure
function getUserDirectory() {
  // ...
}

N3: Use Standard Nomenclature Where Possible

Use terms from the domain, design patterns, or well-known conventions.

// Good - uses pattern name
class UserFactory {
  create(data: unknown) {
    // ...
  }
}

// Good - uses domain term
function calculateAmortization(principal: number, rate: number, term: number) {
  // ...
}

N4: Unambiguous Names

Choose names that make the workings of a function or variable unambiguous.

// Bad - ambiguous
function rename(source: string, target: string) {
  // ...
}

// Good - clear what's being renamed
function renameFile(oldPath: string, newPath: string) {
  // ...
}

N5: Use Longer Names for Longer Scopes

Short names are fine for tiny scopes. Longer scopes need longer, more descriptive names.

// Good - short name for tiny scope
const total = numbers.reduce((sum, n) => sum + n, 0);

// Good - longer name for module-level constant
const MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS_BEFORE_FAILURE = 5;

// Bad - short name at module level
const MAX = 5;

N6: Avoid Encodings

Don't encode type or scope information into names. Modern editors make this unnecessary.

// Bad - Hungarian notation
const strName = "Alice";
const arrUsers: string[] = [];
const nCount = 0;

// Good - clean names
const name = "Alice";
const users: string[] = [];
const count = 0;

// Bad - interface prefix
interface IUserRepository {
  findById(id: string): Promise<unknown>;
}

// Good - just name it
interface UserRepository {
  findById(id: string): Promise<unknown>;
}

N7: Names Should Describe Side Effects

If a function does something beyond what its name suggests, the name is misleading.

const configStore = new Map<string, string>();

// Bad - name doesn't mention file creation
function getConfig(configPath: string) {
  if (!configStore.has(configPath)) {
    configStore.set(configPath, "{}"); // Hidden side effect!
  }
  return JSON.parse(configStore.get(configPath) ?? "{}");
}

// Good - name reveals behavior
function getOrCreateConfig(configPath: string) {
  if (!configStore.has(configPath)) {
    configStore.set(configPath, "{}");
  }
  return JSON.parse(configStore.get(configPath) ?? "{}");
}

Quick Reference

Rule	Principle	Example
N1	Descriptive names	SECONDS_PER_DAY not d
N2	Right abstraction level	getUserDirectory() not getMapOf...
N3	Standard nomenclature	UserFactory, calculateAmortization
N4	Unambiguous	renameFile(oldPath, newPath)
N5	Length matches scope	Short for loops, long for globals
N6	No encodings	users not arrUsers
N7	Describe side effects	getOrCreateConfig()