What this skill carries — grep references/ for any subject the names below miss:
!d=${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}; command -v skill-toc >/dev/null 2>&1 && exec skill-toc "$d"; s=$HOME/.claude/skills/plugin-utils/bin/skill-toc; [ -x "$s" ] && exec "$s" "$d"; echo "(skill-toc unavailable: references and scripts are NOT listed here — install the plugin-utils plugin, or start a new session so its bin/ reaches PATH)"
There is no Lexis retrieval procedure here. Nobody has driven the Lexis UI, so there are no measured selectors, endpoints or steps to follow.
Use workflows:westlaw. It is measured end to end and produces a publisher-keyed DOCX with star
pagination — the same artifact a Lexis route would be built to produce. If the case is available on
Westlaw, the answer to "get it from Lexis" is to get it from Westlaw.
What we know — UNVERIFIED
Both flagged because they come from documentation and general knowledge, not from a session:
- Lexis offers delivery formats comparable to Westlaw's, including Word and RTF. Which dialog controls exist, whether star pagination is a separate option, and what OPC layout the export uses are all unknown.
- Lexis is rolling out an MCP connector (Protégé). If it delivers verbatim case text rather than synthesized research output, it may make browser driving unnecessary — but whether it does is unverified, and Thomson Reuters' CoCounsel connector notably does not (see the westlaw skill).
If you implement this
Drive the UI and record what you measure. Do not write a plausible-looking procedure from the Westlaw one by analogy — a wrong procedure for a real UI costs more than this stub does, because it reads as authoritative and fails silently partway through.