design-system-governance

Design System Governance

Governance Models

Centralized

• Dedicated design system team owns everything.
• Product teams request components through a queue.
• Pros: consistency, quality. Cons: bottleneck, disconnected from product needs.

Federated

• Product teams contribute components.
• Design system team reviews, approves, and maintains.
• Pros: diverse input, faster. Cons: inconsistent quality without strong review.

Community

• Anyone can contribute.
• RFC process for new components.
• Design system team as curators, not gatekeepers.

Contribution Process

1. Proposal: Need identified, RFC written.
2. Review: Design system team + stakeholders evaluate.
3. Build: Contributor builds to system standards.
4. QA: Design + code review, accessibility audit.
5. Document: Usage guidelines, props, examples.
6. Release: Versioned, communicated, integrated.

Health Metrics

• Adoption rate: % of product using system components.
• Override rate: Custom styles overriding system values.
• Contribution rate: Components contributed by product teams.
• Bug rate: Issues in system components vs custom.
• Satisfaction: Developer and designer NPS.