This is the method-name resolution sub-skill for
../standalone-test-repro/SKILL.md.
Resolve the exact source test, owning project, and test invocation, then
continue with the parent's shared extraction steps.
Input
Accept a fully qualified method name copied from a CI failure, for example:
Namespace.TypeName.MethodName
It may include an assembly prefix, xUnit display-name arguments, quotes,
parentheses, nested-type notation, or surrounding CI log text. The surrounding
request may also name a scenario such as jitstress1; preserve it separately
from the method identifier for the parent workflow.
Resolution
- Normalize the identifier:
- Trim quotes, Markdown formatting, leading result labels, and trailing punctuation.
- Preserve xUnit argument text for theory-case resolution.
- Remove an assembly prefix only after verifying it is an assembly name.
- Never reduce the identifier to only the final method segment.
- Do not treat a separately supplied scenario as part of the method name.
- Parse the longest plausible namespace/type prefix and method name. Account
for nested types (
+in reflection names and.in C# source) and generic arity suffixes. - Search C# sources under
src/tests/for the exact method declaration and confirm its containing type and namespace. Prefer symbol information when available; otherwise combine targeted searches for method, type, and namespace. - Find the owning
.csprojby its explicit or evaluatedCompileitems. Account for wildcard includes and merged projects such as JIT regression assemblies. - Inspect the project and source for:
[Fact],[Theory], custom attributes, orTestEntryPoint- Static or instance invocation and constructor requirements
- Fixtures, setup, cleanup, and disposal
- Async and generic return or argument handling
- Conditional compilation and platform guards
- Test data and the specific failing theory row
- Target-specific environment items and batch or Bash pre/post commands
- If display-name arguments identify a theory row, reproduce exactly that
row. If not, generate invocations for all locally resolvable rows and label
them. Use the
ask_usertool when runtime-discovered data or ambiguity prevents a faithful choice. - If multiple source methods still match, present the concrete candidates with
ask_user; do not guess.
Resolution is complete only when the exact source method, owning project, and
required invocation semantics are known. Return any requested scenario
unchanged for canonicalization by the test-scenario-env skill.