SuperAPI AI Directory

cc-frontend-dev

Frontend & websites

View repository

Updated 10-16 05:06

About this skill

Front-end Development Standards

References: Vue Official Style Guide, Element Plus Best Practices


UI Style Constraints

Strictly Prohibited (Common AI Style)

  • ❌ Blue-purple neon gradients, glowing outlines, glassmorphism
  • ❌ Large-area gradients, excessive decorative geometric shapes
  • ❌ Cyberpunk style, dark tech style, AI-style UI
  • ❌ Using emoji in UI copy

Back-office System (Default Style)

Element Requirement
Theme Use the component library's default theme
Color Scheme Primarily black, white, and gray + 1 primary color accent
Motion Restrained, retain only necessary interaction feedback

Tech Stack

Tier Vue (Preferred) React (Alternative)
Framework Vue 3 + TypeScript React 18 + TypeScript
Build Vite Vite
Routing Vue Router 4 React Router 6
State Pinia Zustand
UI Library Element Plus Ant Design

Vue Coding Standards

Component Basics

<script setup lang="ts">
import { ref, computed, onMounted } from 'vue'
import type { User } from '@/types'

// Props & Emits
const props = defineProps<{ userId: number }>()
const emit = defineEmits<{ (e: 'update', value: string): void }>()

// 响应式状态
const loading = ref(false)
const user = ref<User | null>(null)

// 计算属性
const displayName = computed(() => user.value?.name ?? '未知用户')

// 生命周期
onMounted(async () => { await fetchUser() })

// 方法
async function fetchUser() {
  loading.value = true
  try {
    user.value = await api.getUser(props.userId)
  } finally {
    loading.value = false
  }
}
</script>

<template>
  <div class="user-card">
    <h3>{{ displayName }}</h3>
  </div>
</template>

<style scoped>
.user-card { padding: 16px; }
</style>

Naming Conventions

Type Convention Example
Component File PascalCase.vue UserCard.vue
Composables useXxx.ts useAuth.ts
Store useXxxStore.ts useUserStore.ts

State Management (Pinia)

// stores/user.ts
export const useUserStore = defineStore('user', () => {
  const user = ref<User | null>(null)
  const token = ref<string>('')

  const isLoggedIn = computed(() => !!token.value)

  async function login(username: string, password: string) {
    const res = await api.login(username, password)
    token.value = res.token
    user.value = res.user
  }

  return { user, token, isLoggedIn, login }
})

Interaction State Handling

States That Must Be Handled: loading、empty、error、disabled、submitting

<template>
  <el-skeleton v-if="loading" :rows="5" animated />
  <el-result v-else-if="error" icon="error" :title="error">
    <template #extra>
      <el-button @click="fetchData">重试</el-button>
    </template>
  </el-result>
  <el-empty v-else-if="list.length === 0" description="暂无数据" />
  <template v-else>
    <!-- 正常内容 -->
  </template>
</template>

TypeScript Standards

// types/user.ts
export interface User {
  id: number
  username: string
  role: 'admin' | 'user'
}

export interface ApiResponse<T = unknown> {
  code: number
  message: string
  data: T
}

API Call Type Safety

Rule Description
✅ API utility functions support generics get<T>(url): Promise<T> instead of returning unknown
✅ Specify generics or assertions at the call site get<UserInfo>(url) or data as typeof ref.value
❌ Prohibit as any bypass Masking type issues leads to pitfalls in later maintenance
// ❌ get() 返回 unknown,赋值报 TS2322
const data = await get('/contact/config')
contact.value = data

// ❌ as any 绕过
contact.value = data as any

// ✅ 泛型约束(推荐)
const data = await get<ContactConfig>('/contact/config')
contact.value = data

// ✅ 类型断言(最小改动)
contact.value = data as typeof contact.value

Performance Optimization

Scenario Solution
Large lists Virtual scrolling
Routing Lazy loading () => import()
Computation Use computed caching
Large data Use shallowRef
// 路由懒加载
const routes = [
  { path: '/dashboard', component: () => import('@/views/Dashboard.vue') }
]

// 请求防抖
import { useDebounceFn } from '@vueuse/core'
const debouncedSearch = useDebounceFn((keyword) => api.search(keyword), 300)

Directory Structure

src/
├── assets/
│   └── styles/          # 全局/共享样式
├── api/                 # API 请求
├── components/          # 通用组件
├── composables/         # 组合式函数
├── router/              # 路由配置
├── stores/              # Pinia stores
├── types/               # TypeScript 类型
├── utils/               # 工具函数
├── views/               # 页面组件
├── App.vue
└── main.ts

Style Management Standards

Rule Description
❌ Prohibited in .vue writing large blocks of styles <style> block must not exceed 20 lines
❌ Prohibited in .tsx writing large blocks of inline styles Style objects/CSS-in-JS must not exceed 20 lines
✅ Extract shared styles to src/assets/styles/ Split files by module
✅ Keep only minimal styles within components Vue: scoped fine-tuning; React: className references
src/assets/styles/
├── variables.scss       # 变量(颜色、间距、字号)
├── common.scss          # 通用样式
└── [module].scss        # 按模块拆分

Request Body Completeness Standards

Rule Description
❌ Prohibit not passing optional UI fields to the API Fields selected/entered by the user must all be passed in the request body
✅ Submit function corresponds one-to-one with form fields Use a TypeScript interface to constrain the request body
// ❌ UI 有支付方式选择器,但请求体没传 payMethod
const payMethod = ref<'wechat' | 'points' | 'mixed'>('wechat')

async function createOrder() {
  await api.createOrder({
    items: orderItems.value,
    addressId: selectedAddress.value.id,
    // payMethod 忘记传了!支付方式选择 UI 形同虚设
  })
}

// ✅ 请求体与 UI 表单字段对应
interface CreateOrderRequest {
  items: OrderItem[]
  addressId: number
  payMethod: 'wechat' | 'points' | 'mixed'  // 类型约束确保不遗漏
}

async function createOrder() {
  const request: CreateOrderRequest = {
    items: orderItems.value,
    addressId: selectedAddress.value.id,
    payMethod: payMethod.value,  // TypeScript 会提示缺少字段
  }
  await api.createOrder(request)
}

API Error Handling Standards

Rule Description
❌ Must not silently ignore non-success responses res.code !== 200 must prompt the user
✅ Unified error prompts Unified for non-success responses message.error prompt
✅ Network exceptions must also be handled try/catch catch request exceptions
// ❌ 只处理成功,非 200 静默忽略
const res = await api.getList(params)
if (res.code === 200) {
  list.value = res.data
}

// ✅ 成功 + 失败都处理
try {
  const res = await api.getList(params)
  if (res.code === 200) {
    list.value = res.data
  } else {
    message.error(res.message || '加载失败')
  }
} catch (e) {
  message.error('网络异常,请稍后重试')
}

React/antd high-frequency pitfalls

This section applies to React + Ant Design projects (Vue + Element Plus users can skip). For similar Vue issues see references/frontend-style.md.

Pitfall #1: controlled vs uncontrolled misuse → user operations fail

<Table pagination={{ pageSize: 20 }}> Hardcoding pageSize to 20 → the component treats it as a controlled prop, so when the user switches "10 / 50 / 100" it is immediately overwritten back to 20. The bottom dropdown looks clickable but is actually ineffective.

Prop controlled form uncontrolled form (recommended)
antd Table page size pagination={{ pageSize, onChange }} pagination={{ defaultPageSize: 20 }}
antd Tree expand expandedKeys + onExpand defaultExpandedKeys or defaultExpandAll
antd Input content value + onChange defaultValue
antd Form fields Form.Item + form instance initialValue
antd Tabs current page activeKey + onChange defaultActiveKey
// ❌ controlled 但没 onChange → 用户切换无效
<Table pagination={{ pageSize: 20, showSizeChanger: true }} />

// ✅ uncontrolled,组件自己管
<Table pagination={{
  defaultPageSize: 20,
  showSizeChanger: true,
  pageSizeOptions: [10, 20, 50, 100],
}} />

// ✅ 或完整 controlled
const [pageSize, setPageSize] = useState(20);
<Table pagination={{
  pageSize,
  onShowSizeChange: (_, size) => setPageSize(size),
  showSizeChanger: true,
}} />

Decision rule: either provide the full set of "pass value + listen", or use defaultXxx。Do not pass a value without listening。

Pitfall #2: Tree defaultExpandAll + setState → reset back to fully expanded after editing

<Tree defaultExpandAll> is an uncontrolled default value, so every time setCategories(...) the Tree is re-rendered it gets reset → all the nodes the user painstakingly collapsed pop back open.

// ❌ 编辑分类名后整棵树被重置成全展开
<Tree treeData={treeData} defaultExpandAll />

// ✅ controlled expandedKeys + 只在初次 mount 时填充
const [expandedKeys, setExpandedKeys] = useState<React.Key[]>([]);
const initialExpandDoneRef = useRef(false);

const loadCategories = async () => {
  const data = (await getCategoryTree()).data || [];
  setCategories(data);
  if (!initialExpandDoneRef.current && data.length > 0) {
    setExpandedKeys(collectAllCategoryKeys(data));
    initialExpandDoneRef.current = true;  // 关键:之后再 loadCategories 不重置
  }
};

<Tree
  treeData={treeData}
  expandedKeys={expandedKeys}
  onExpand={setExpandedKeys}
/>

Pitfall #3: useEffect double polling conflict → timer explosion

One useEffect uses setTimeout recursive polling, while another useEffect that depends on status also starts setInterval. Both existing together → each cycle triggers 2 API calls; status changes cause the second effect to rebuild the interval → leftover timers accumulate more and more.

// ❌ 双 polling 共存
useEffect(() => {
  let timerId: NodeJS.Timeout | null = null;
  const pollOnce = async () => {
    const s = (await getStatus()).data;
    setRefreshState(s);
    if (s.status === 'RUNNING') {
      timerId = setTimeout(pollOnce, 3000);  // 第一套
    }
  };
  pollOnce();
  return () => { if (timerId) clearTimeout(timerId); };
}, []);

useEffect(() => {
  if (refreshState?.status !== 'RUNNING') return;
  const timerId = setInterval(async () => {  // 第二套
    setRefreshState((await getStatus()).data);
  }, 3000);
  return () => clearInterval(timerId);
}, [refreshState?.status]);
// ✅ 只能一套:初次 fetch 在 mount effect,polling 由 status effect 接管
useEffect(() => {
  let cancelled = false;
  getStatus().then(resp => { if (!cancelled) setRefreshState(resp.data); });
  return () => { cancelled = true; };
}, []);

useEffect(() => {
  if (refreshState?.status !== 'RUNNING') return;
  const timerId = setInterval(async () => {
    const s = (await getStatus()).data;
    setRefreshState(s);
    if (s.status !== 'RUNNING') clearInterval(timerId);
  }, 3000);
  return () => clearInterval(timerId);
}, [refreshState?.status]);

See cc-async-task-pattern skill - Pitfall #5

Pitfall #4: Cross-component state synchronization using prop drilling or a global store is too heavy → revision counter pattern

Scenario: the category management tab changes a category name, and the dropdown in the product list tab needs to refresh. Introducing Redux/Zustand has a high cost, and passing props layer by layer is troublesome.

// ✅ revision counter:父级维护一个数字,子组件 useEffect 监听
const ProductPage = () => {
  const [categoryRevision, setCategoryRevision] = useState(0);
  const bumpCategoryRevision = () => setCategoryRevision(n => n + 1);

  return <Tabs items={[
    { key: 'products', children: <ProductManagement categoryRevision={categoryRevision} /> },
    { key: 'categories', children: <CategoryManagement onCategoriesChanged={bumpCategoryRevision} /> },
  ]} />;
};

// ProductManagement 内部
useEffect(() => {
  if (categoryRevision !== undefined && categoryRevision > 0) {
    loadCategories();  // 任意 > 0 的变化都触发重新拉取
  }
}, [categoryRevision]);

Why not use useContext? When components are far apart, changes are infrequent, and you don't want all Consumers to re-render, a revision counter is lighter than Context.

Pitfall #5: Asynchronous operations may time out → should switch to async task mode

When the frontend encounters a 30s API timeout, repeated user clicks, or a loading spinner stuck forever, the root cause is often that the backend is a synchronous API.Do not add timeout retries on the frontend, have the backend switch to trigger + polling mode (see cc-async-task-pattern skill). Frontend coordination:

UX item Implementation
Trigger button RUNNING state loading + disabled, text changes to "回填中 N%"
Top progress prompt <Alert type="info"> + <Progress percent={N} />
Any user coming in sees the status Call once on mount getStatus()
Automatically refresh the main list on completion useEffect listen for status changes, on SUCCESS loadData()
Error pass-through state.errorMessage directly message.error()

Type reuse conventions

Rule Description
❌ Do not repeatedly define the same interface in multiple files PageResponse、BaseResult etc.
✅ Common types are unified under @/types/common.ts global exports, referenced everywhere
// ❌ 每个 api 文件都定义一遍
// api/user.ts
interface PageResponse<T> { list: T[]; total: number }
// api/order.ts
interface PageResponse<T> { list: T[]; total: number } // 重复

// ✅ 统一定义,各处引用
// types/common.ts
export interface PageResponse<T> {
  list: T[]
  total: number
}

// api/user.ts
import type { PageResponse } from '@/types/common'

Detailed reference

File Content
references/frontend-style.md UI style, Vue 3 conventions, Pinia, API encapsulation, performance optimization
references/miniapp-pitfalls.md uni-app pitfalls: page stack is read-only, Storage cleanup timing, lifecycle double triggering, frontend validation mirroring
references/date-time.md dayjs/date-fns date addition and subtraction, accounting period calculation, month-end alignment prohibited

📋 This reply follows:cc-frontend-dev - [specific section]