SuperAPI AI Directory

audit-book-writing-v2

Writing & research

View repository

Updated 10-15 20:30

About this skill

Audit Book Writing Professional Version Skill

A complete audit book writing and review workflow, integrating a knowledge base of 100 laws and regulations, supporting a multi-domain, dual-mode, multi-file traceability audit book quality improvement system.

Core Principles (Must Be Followed)

⚠️ Data Verification Principles (Highest Priority)

It is absolutely forbidden to fabricate any content, data, or cited materials

Strict Requirements for Citing Laws and Regulations

  1. Must use the laws and regulations database for queries
    # 使用 Grep 在法规库中查询(skill 内置)
    Grep -pattern "关键词" -path="references/laws-database/*.md"
    
  1. Citation format must be complete

    **《[法规全称]》**([年份] [修正/修订/通过])第[条款号]条
    
  2. Forbidden to fabricate or guess legal provisions

    • ❌ Forbidden to cite uncertain or unverified regulations
    • ❌ Forbidden to cite clause content from memory or speculation
    • ✅ Must consult the original text of the regulations

Strict Requirements for Citing Statistical Data

  1. Must use online tools to query and indicate the source

    WebSearch "统计关键词 年份 site:权威网站"
    
  2. Must indicate the publishing institution and publication time

    [数据发布机构]. [年份]. [统计报告名称]. [发布时间].
    [来源:[机构官方网站URL]]
    
  3. If accurate data cannot be queried

    **[待核实:该数据需要人工核对后补充]**
    

Strict Requirements for Citing Case Data

  1. Case facts must be accurate

    • Company names, dates, amounts, etc. must be accurate
    • Sourced from public audit reports or regulatory documents
    • Forbidden to fabricate cases or invent facts
  2. Regulatory basis must be accurate

    • Use the regulations database to query and verify
    • Indicate the complete regulation name and clause number
    • Forbidden to cite uncertain clauses

Data Verification Priority

优先级1(最高):法律法规库 → 使用Grep在法规库中查询
优先级2(中等):联网查询 → 使用WebSearch查询权威网站
优先级3(保底):标注待核实 → 明确标注需要人工核对

Consequences of Violations

  • Discovery of fabricated data or citations → the entire chapter must be re-reviewed and corrected
  • Incomplete citations → mark as "[To be verified]" and supplement
  • Incorrect legal clauses → must be re-verified and corrected

⚠️ Word Count Control Principles (Strict Standards)

Word Count Requirements for Revision Mode

Core requirements: The character count of the optimized draft must be controlled within 95%-120% range of the original draft

Calculation formula:

原稿字符数 = X
优化稿字符数 = Y
比例 = Y / X × 100%

合格标准:95% ≤ 比例 ≤ 120%

Check points:

  1. When generating the optimized draft: estimate the character count
  2. After generating the optimized draft: count the actual character count

Handling of exceedance:

  • Ratio < 95%: content is overly condensed,must supplementmissing important content
  • Ratio > 120%: content is overly expanded,must condenseredundant expressions
  • 95%-120%: qualified, meets optimization requirements

Statistical command:

# 统计字符数(含空格)
wc -m <文件路径>

Word Count Requirements for Restructuring Mode

Core requirements: Word count is flexible, but the reason for the change must be explained

Explanation requirements:

  • If the word count increases by more than 150%, explain what important content was added
  • If the word count decreases below 80%, explain what redundant content was deleted
  • Explain the reasons for word count changes in detail in the completion report

⚠️ Mode Selection Principles

Revision mode: Suitable when the original draft has a clear framework and core viewpoints

  • Retain the original draft's core viewpoints and connotations (strictly forbidden to change)
  • Optimize the expression and logical structure
  • Supplement missing information and remove duplicate content
  • Keep word count between 95%-120%
  • No need for user confirmation of viewpoints and structure (unless major issues are found)

Restructuring mode: Applicable when the original manuscript has a chaotic structure or unclear viewpoints

  • Must first extract and confirm the academic viewpoints
  • Must first propose and confirm the new structure
  • May substantially add or remove content and adjust the structure
  • Word count is flexible but reasons must be provided
  • Restructuring can only begin after user confirmation

Quick start

Step 1: Read the original manuscript

Read: <原稿文件路径>

Step 2: Choose optimization mode

原稿是否结构清晰且有明确核心观点?
├─ 是 → **修订模式**
└─ 否 → **重构模式**

Step 3: Execute the workflow

  • Revision mode: proceed directly to the four-round review
  • Restructuring mode: first confirm the viewpoints and structure, then conduct the four-round review

See references/audit-book-templates.md


Legal and regulatory knowledge base

Knowledge base location

Main knowledge base path:references/laws-database/(built into the skill)

Knowledge base statistics

Level Quantity Description
National level 47 Promulgated by the National People's Congress, the State Council and their departments
Zhejiang Province 14 Local regulations of Zhejiang Province
Taizhou City 4 Local norms of Taizhou City
International conventions 2 International organizations such as UNESCO
Other 33 Other relevant regulations

Total: 100 regulatory documents

Core regulations

  1. Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Cultural Relics(2024 amendment)
  2. Law of the People's Republic of China on Intangible Cultural Heritage
  3. Regulations on the Protection of Famous Historical and Cultural Cities, Towns and Villages
  4. Measures for the Administration of Cultural Relics Protection Projects
  5. Measures for the Administration of Museums

How to search regulations

# 基本查询
Grep -pattern "关键词" -path="references/laws-database/*.md"

# 示例1:查询"审计"相关法规
Grep -pattern "审计" -path="references/laws-database/*.md"

# 示例2:查询"保护"相关法规
Grep -pattern="保护" -path="references/laws-database/*.md"

See references/audit-knowledge-base.md


Four-round review standards

Round 1: Content accuracy review

Audit-domain specific check items:

  1. Accuracy of legal citations

    • Whether the names of laws and regulations are accurate
    • Whether the article numbers are correct
    • Whether the promulgation date and effective date are complete
    • Whether the citation format is standard
  2. Accuracy of concept definitions

    • Whether audit terminology is accurate
    • Whether the concept of cultural heritage is accurate
    • Whether the use of professional terminology is consistent
  3. Accuracy of data support

    • Whether statistical data have sources
    • Whether case data are accurate
    • Whether the funding amounts are accurate
  4. Accuracy of factual statements

    • Whether the facts of audit cases are accurate
    • Whether the descriptions of audit procedures are accurate
    • Whether the audit conclusions are reasonable

Round 2: Logical coherence review

Audit-domain specific check items:

  1. Logical coherence of chapters

    • Whether the audit logic is clear
    • Whether the procedure descriptions are coherent
    • Whether the conclusion derivation is reasonable
  2. Coherence of conceptual hierarchy

    • Whether the conceptual system is complete
    • Whether conceptual relationships are clear
  3. Logicality of audit argumentation

    • Whether audit evidence is sufficient
    • Whether the chain of argumentation is complete

Round 3: Applicability Review

Audit domain-specific check items:

  1. Practicality of audit guidelines(P0 level, 800-1500 words)

    • Scope definition standards
    • Key audit content
    • Audit methods and procedures
    • Handling of common issues
  2. Practicality of the framework

    • Conceptual framework table
    • Classification cross-reference table
    • Standards comparison table
    • Issue-regulation cross-reference table
  3. Applicability of cases

    • Explanation of typical cases
    • Description of the audit process
    • Summary of audit findings
    • Audit insights(800-1500 words)

Round 4: Format Standardization Review

Audit domain-specific check items:

  1. Standardization of heading levels

    • Level 1 heading: Chapter X
    • Level 2 heading: I, II, III
    • Level 3 heading: (1) (2) (3)
    • Level 4 heading: 1. 2. 3.
  2. Legal citation format

    • Full name of regulation + year + article number
    • Unified format, complete citations
  3. Consistency in terminology use

    • Unified audit terminology
    • Unified cultural heritage terminology

See references/audit-book-templates.md


List of output files

Files that must be generated (5)

  1. Chapter X-Comprehensive Four-Round Review.md(review records directory)

    • Round 1: Content Accuracy Review
    • Round 2: Logical Coherence Review
    • Round 3: Applicability Review
    • Round 4: Format Standardization Review
    • Optimization priority ranking (P0/P1/P2)
    • Optimization direction suggestions
  2. Chapter X-Comprehensive Optimization Description.md(optimization output directory)

    • Optimization overview
    • Classification of optimization content
    • Before-and-after comparison
    • Data source explanation
    • Word count control explanation
  3. Chapter X-Optimization Comparison.md(optimization output directory)

    • Overall comparison
    • Comparison of content elements
    • Summary of optimization types
    • Presentation of core optimization points
  4. Chapter X-Optimized Draft.md(optimization output directory) ⭐ Core output

    • Complete optimized chapter
    • Revision mode: retain the original draft's viewpoints, optimize quality
    • Restructuring mode: reconstructed version after confirming viewpoints and structure
  5. Chapter X-Completion Report.md(optimization output directory)

    • Completion status of optimization tasks
    • List of generated files
    • Statistics of optimization results
    • Statistics of quality improvement
    • Review Issue Resolution Status
    • Overall Evaluation

Additional Files for Restructuring Mode (2 files)

  1. Academic Viewpoint Confirmation.md(Specific to Restructuring Mode)

    • Extraction of Core Viewpoints from the Original Manuscript
    • User Confirmation Record
  2. Structural Optimization Plan.md(Specific to Restructuring Mode)

    • Structural Analysis of the Original Manuscript
    • Optimization Plan Recommendations
    • User Confirmation Record

Audit Book Chapter Types

Theoretical Foundation Chapters

Characteristics: Explain concepts, theoretical frameworks, and development history

Optimization Focus:

  • Supplement authoritative definitions (regulations, academic)
  • Establish concept framework tables
  • Supplement theoretical basis
  • Write audit application guidelines

Template: See references/audit-book-templates.md → "Theoretical Foundation Chapter Template"

Practical Operation Chapters

Characteristics: Describe audit procedures, methods, and steps

Optimization Focus:

  • Clarify operational steps
  • Supplement control points
  • Establish method comparison tables
  • Supplement typical cases

Template: See references/audit-book-templates.md → "Practical Operation Chapter Template"

Case Analysis Chapters

Characteristics: Presentation and analysis of audit cases

Optimization Focus:

  • Improve case elements
  • Supplement audit process
  • Strengthen audit findings
  • Expand audit insights (800-1500 words)

Audit Application Guidelines Template

Required Content (800-1500 words)

## 四、审计应用指引

### (一)范畴界定标准

1. **[界定维度1]**
   - 标准描述:[标准]
   - 判断依据:[依据]
   - 法规支撑:**《[法规名]》**第X条

### (二)审计重点内容

1. **[重点1]**
   - 审计要点:[要点]
   - 审计方法:[方法]
   - 法规依据:**《[法规名]》**第X条

### (三)审计方法步骤

1. **[步骤1]**
   - 操作要点:[要点]
   - 注意事项:[事项]
   - 法规要求:**《[法规名]》**第X条

### (四)常见问题处理

1. **[问题1]**
   - 问题描述:[问题]
   - 处理方法:[方法]
   - 法规依据:**《[法规名]》**第X条

Audit Case Insights Template

Required Content (800-1500 words)

**审计启示**:(800-1500字)

本案例体现了审计的以下重要价值:

**第一,理论价值**。(200-300字)
[阐述案例的理论意义]

**第二,实践价值**。(200-300字)
[阐述案例的实践参考价值]

**第三,方法借鉴**。(200-300字)
[阐述可借鉴的审计方法]

**第四,风险警示**。(200-300字)
[阐述需要警惕的风险点]

Standard Format for Legal Citation

Single Legal Citation

**《[法规全称]》**([年份] [修正/修订/通过])第[条款号]条

Multiple Clause Citation

**《[法规全称]》**第X条、第Y条、第Z条规定:

Clause Content Citation

根据**《[法规全称]》**第X条规定:
"[条款内容]"

Issue-Law Comparison Table

**表X-X 审计问题法规依据对照表**

| 审计问题 | 法规依据 | 条款内容 | 问题性质 |
|---------|---------|---------|---------|
| [问题1] | **《[法规]》**第X条 | [内容] | [性质] |

Quality Checklist

A-Level Optimization Standards (Audit Books)

  • Use the laws and regulations database for legal query and verification
  • Complete 4 rounds of review and generate review records
  • Supplement at least 2 theoretical bases (academic definitions or international standards)
  • Establish at least 3 framework tables (concept framework, classification comparison, standard comparison)
  • Establish an issue-law comparison table
  • Write audit application guidelines (800-1500 words)
  • Supplement typical cases, with audit insights for each case (800-1500 words)
  • All legal citations are complete, accurate, and standardized
  • All data are accompanied by source annotations
  • Character count controlled at 95%-120% of the original manuscript (revision mode)
  • Quality improved by at least +1.5 levels
  • Preserve the core viewpoints and connotations of the original manuscript (revision mode)

Reference File Description

references/audit-knowledge-base.md

When to Use: When it is necessary to query audit domain knowledge or legal database information

Contents Included:

  • Location and structure of the laws and regulations knowledge base
  • Statistical information on 100 laws and regulations
  • List of core laws and regulations (Top 10)
  • Usage methods for legal query tools
  • Standard format for legal citation
  • Auditing Standards System
  • Auditing Terminology Comparison Table
  • Audit Case Data Sources
  • Statistical Data Sources
  • Academic Citation Standards
  • Data Verification Priority
  • Prohibited Actions List

references/audit-book-templates.md

When to Use: When executing each round of review and generating output files

Includes:

  • Output File Organization Structure
  • Four-Round Review Standards (for auditing books)
  • Auditing Book Chapter Templates (theoretical foundation type, practical operation type)
  • Optimized Draft Template (revision mode)
  • Standard Format for Legal Citations
  • Standard Format for Audit Cases
  • Optimization Completion Standards (Grade A standards)

Workflow

Revision Mode Workflow

  1. Read the original manuscript
  2. Execute Round 1 review: content accuracy → generate review record
  3. Execute Round 2 review: logical coherence → generate review record
  4. Execute Round 3 review: applicability → generate review record
  5. Execute Round 4 review: format standardization → generate review record
  6. Summarize the four rounds of review → generate comprehensive optimization notes
  7. Select typical optimization cases → generate optimization comparison
  8. Based on the comprehensive optimization notes → generate optimized draft
  9. Summarize results and improvements → generate completion report

Restructuring Mode Workflow

  1. Read the original manuscript
  2. Extract academic viewpoints → generate academic viewpoint confirmation document
  3. Wait for user confirmation
  4. Propose structural optimization plan → generate structural optimization plan document
  5. Wait for user confirmation
  6. Execute Round 1 review: content accuracy → generate review record
  7. Execute Round 2 review: logical coherence → generate review record
  8. Execute Round 3 review: applicability → generate review record
  9. Execute Round 4 review: format standardization → generate review record
  10. Summarize the four rounds of review → generate comprehensive optimization notes
  11. Select typical optimization cases → generate optimization comparison
  12. Based on the comprehensive optimization notes → generate optimized draft (restructured version)
  13. Summarize results and improvements → generate completion report

Common Issue Handling

Q1: How to look up laws and regulations?

A: Use the Grep tool to search in the legal database

Grep -pattern "关键词" -path="references/laws-database/*.md"

Q2: How to cite laws and regulations?

A: Use the standard format

**《[法规全称]》**([年份] [修正/修订/通过])第[条款号]条

Q3: How many words should the audit application guidelines contain?

A: 800-1500 words, including four parts: scope definition standards, key audit content, audit methods and steps, and common issue handling.

Q4: How many words should the case insights contain?

A: 800-1500 words, elaborated from four aspects: theoretical value, practical value, methodological reference, and risk warning.

Q5: What to do if the word count exceeds the limit?

A:

  • < 95%: Supplement important missing content
  • 120%: Delete redundant expressions, streamline repetitive content


Skill Features

  • Highly professional: Designed specifically for auditing book writing
  • Legal database integration: 100 laws and regulations knowledge base
  • Four-round review: accuracy, logic, applicability, standardization
  • Dual-mode support: Revision mode (conservative optimization) and reconstruction mode (major adjustments)
  • Multi-file traceability: 5 review files + 1 optimized draft
  • Template refinement: Standard templates for audit application guidelines, case insights, legal citations, etc.
  • Quality assurance: Grade A optimization standard, quality improvement +1.5 levels

Target audience: Audit book authors, audit researchers, audit practitioners Primary uses: Audit book chapter optimization, audit guide writing, audit case analysis