A complete audit book writing and review workflow, integrating a knowledge base of 100 laws and regulations, supporting a multi-domain, dual-mode, multi-file traceability audit book quality improvement system.
Core Principles (Must Be Followed)
⚠️ Data Verification Principles (Highest Priority)
It is absolutely forbidden to fabricate any content, data, or cited materials
Strict Requirements for Citing Laws and Regulations
- Must use the laws and regulations database for queries
# 使用 Grep 在法规库中查询(skill 内置) Grep -pattern "关键词" -path="references/laws-database/*.md"
-
Citation format must be complete
**《[法规全称]》**([年份] [修正/修订/通过])第[条款号]条 -
Forbidden to fabricate or guess legal provisions
- ❌ Forbidden to cite uncertain or unverified regulations
- ❌ Forbidden to cite clause content from memory or speculation
- ✅ Must consult the original text of the regulations
Strict Requirements for Citing Statistical Data
-
Must use online tools to query and indicate the source
WebSearch "统计关键词 年份 site:权威网站" -
Must indicate the publishing institution and publication time
[数据发布机构]. [年份]. [统计报告名称]. [发布时间]. [来源:[机构官方网站URL]] -
If accurate data cannot be queried
**[待核实:该数据需要人工核对后补充]**
Strict Requirements for Citing Case Data
-
Case facts must be accurate
- Company names, dates, amounts, etc. must be accurate
- Sourced from public audit reports or regulatory documents
- Forbidden to fabricate cases or invent facts
-
Regulatory basis must be accurate
- Use the regulations database to query and verify
- Indicate the complete regulation name and clause number
- Forbidden to cite uncertain clauses
Data Verification Priority
优先级1(最高):法律法规库 → 使用Grep在法规库中查询
优先级2(中等):联网查询 → 使用WebSearch查询权威网站
优先级3(保底):标注待核实 → 明确标注需要人工核对
Consequences of Violations
- Discovery of fabricated data or citations → the entire chapter must be re-reviewed and corrected
- Incomplete citations → mark as "[To be verified]" and supplement
- Incorrect legal clauses → must be re-verified and corrected
⚠️ Word Count Control Principles (Strict Standards)
Word Count Requirements for Revision Mode
Core requirements: The character count of the optimized draft must be controlled within 95%-120% range of the original draft
Calculation formula:
原稿字符数 = X
优化稿字符数 = Y
比例 = Y / X × 100%
合格标准:95% ≤ 比例 ≤ 120%
Check points:
- When generating the optimized draft: estimate the character count
- After generating the optimized draft: count the actual character count
Handling of exceedance:
- Ratio < 95%: content is overly condensed,must supplementmissing important content
- Ratio > 120%: content is overly expanded,must condenseredundant expressions
- 95%-120%: qualified, meets optimization requirements
Statistical command:
# 统计字符数(含空格)
wc -m <文件路径>
Word Count Requirements for Restructuring Mode
Core requirements: Word count is flexible, but the reason for the change must be explained
Explanation requirements:
- If the word count increases by more than 150%, explain what important content was added
- If the word count decreases below 80%, explain what redundant content was deleted
- Explain the reasons for word count changes in detail in the completion report
⚠️ Mode Selection Principles
Revision mode: Suitable when the original draft has a clear framework and core viewpoints
- Retain the original draft's core viewpoints and connotations (strictly forbidden to change)
- Optimize the expression and logical structure
- Supplement missing information and remove duplicate content
- Keep word count between 95%-120%
- No need for user confirmation of viewpoints and structure (unless major issues are found)
Restructuring mode: Applicable when the original manuscript has a chaotic structure or unclear viewpoints
- Must first extract and confirm the academic viewpoints
- Must first propose and confirm the new structure
- May substantially add or remove content and adjust the structure
- Word count is flexible but reasons must be provided
- Restructuring can only begin after user confirmation
Quick start
Step 1: Read the original manuscript
Read: <原稿文件路径>
Step 2: Choose optimization mode
原稿是否结构清晰且有明确核心观点?
├─ 是 → **修订模式**
└─ 否 → **重构模式**
Step 3: Execute the workflow
- Revision mode: proceed directly to the four-round review
- Restructuring mode: first confirm the viewpoints and structure, then conduct the four-round review
See references/audit-book-templates.md
Legal and regulatory knowledge base
Knowledge base location
Main knowledge base path:references/laws-database/(built into the skill)
Knowledge base statistics
| Level | Quantity | Description |
|---|---|---|
| National level | 47 | Promulgated by the National People's Congress, the State Council and their departments |
| Zhejiang Province | 14 | Local regulations of Zhejiang Province |
| Taizhou City | 4 | Local norms of Taizhou City |
| International conventions | 2 | International organizations such as UNESCO |
| Other | 33 | Other relevant regulations |
Total: 100 regulatory documents
Core regulations
- Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Cultural Relics(2024 amendment)
- Law of the People's Republic of China on Intangible Cultural Heritage
- Regulations on the Protection of Famous Historical and Cultural Cities, Towns and Villages
- Measures for the Administration of Cultural Relics Protection Projects
- Measures for the Administration of Museums
How to search regulations
# 基本查询
Grep -pattern "关键词" -path="references/laws-database/*.md"
# 示例1:查询"审计"相关法规
Grep -pattern "审计" -path="references/laws-database/*.md"
# 示例2:查询"保护"相关法规
Grep -pattern="保护" -path="references/laws-database/*.md"
See references/audit-knowledge-base.md
Four-round review standards
Round 1: Content accuracy review
Audit-domain specific check items:
-
Accuracy of legal citations
- Whether the names of laws and regulations are accurate
- Whether the article numbers are correct
- Whether the promulgation date and effective date are complete
- Whether the citation format is standard
-
Accuracy of concept definitions
- Whether audit terminology is accurate
- Whether the concept of cultural heritage is accurate
- Whether the use of professional terminology is consistent
-
Accuracy of data support
- Whether statistical data have sources
- Whether case data are accurate
- Whether the funding amounts are accurate
-
Accuracy of factual statements
- Whether the facts of audit cases are accurate
- Whether the descriptions of audit procedures are accurate
- Whether the audit conclusions are reasonable
Round 2: Logical coherence review
Audit-domain specific check items:
-
Logical coherence of chapters
- Whether the audit logic is clear
- Whether the procedure descriptions are coherent
- Whether the conclusion derivation is reasonable
-
Coherence of conceptual hierarchy
- Whether the conceptual system is complete
- Whether conceptual relationships are clear
-
Logicality of audit argumentation
- Whether audit evidence is sufficient
- Whether the chain of argumentation is complete
Round 3: Applicability Review
Audit domain-specific check items:
-
Practicality of audit guidelines(P0 level, 800-1500 words)
- Scope definition standards
- Key audit content
- Audit methods and procedures
- Handling of common issues
-
Practicality of the framework
- Conceptual framework table
- Classification cross-reference table
- Standards comparison table
- Issue-regulation cross-reference table
-
Applicability of cases
- Explanation of typical cases
- Description of the audit process
- Summary of audit findings
- Audit insights(800-1500 words)
Round 4: Format Standardization Review
Audit domain-specific check items:
-
Standardization of heading levels
- Level 1 heading: Chapter X
- Level 2 heading: I, II, III
- Level 3 heading: (1) (2) (3)
- Level 4 heading: 1. 2. 3.
-
Legal citation format
- Full name of regulation + year + article number
- Unified format, complete citations
-
Consistency in terminology use
- Unified audit terminology
- Unified cultural heritage terminology
See references/audit-book-templates.md
List of output files
Files that must be generated (5)
-
Chapter X-Comprehensive Four-Round Review.md(review records directory)
- Round 1: Content Accuracy Review
- Round 2: Logical Coherence Review
- Round 3: Applicability Review
- Round 4: Format Standardization Review
- Optimization priority ranking (P0/P1/P2)
- Optimization direction suggestions
-
Chapter X-Comprehensive Optimization Description.md(optimization output directory)
- Optimization overview
- Classification of optimization content
- Before-and-after comparison
- Data source explanation
- Word count control explanation
-
Chapter X-Optimization Comparison.md(optimization output directory)
- Overall comparison
- Comparison of content elements
- Summary of optimization types
- Presentation of core optimization points
-
Chapter X-Optimized Draft.md(optimization output directory) ⭐ Core output
- Complete optimized chapter
- Revision mode: retain the original draft's viewpoints, optimize quality
- Restructuring mode: reconstructed version after confirming viewpoints and structure
-
Chapter X-Completion Report.md(optimization output directory)
- Completion status of optimization tasks
- List of generated files
- Statistics of optimization results
- Statistics of quality improvement
- Review Issue Resolution Status
- Overall Evaluation
Additional Files for Restructuring Mode (2 files)
-
Academic Viewpoint Confirmation.md(Specific to Restructuring Mode)
- Extraction of Core Viewpoints from the Original Manuscript
- User Confirmation Record
-
Structural Optimization Plan.md(Specific to Restructuring Mode)
- Structural Analysis of the Original Manuscript
- Optimization Plan Recommendations
- User Confirmation Record
Audit Book Chapter Types
Theoretical Foundation Chapters
Characteristics: Explain concepts, theoretical frameworks, and development history
Optimization Focus:
- Supplement authoritative definitions (regulations, academic)
- Establish concept framework tables
- Supplement theoretical basis
- Write audit application guidelines
Template: See references/audit-book-templates.md → "Theoretical Foundation Chapter Template"
Practical Operation Chapters
Characteristics: Describe audit procedures, methods, and steps
Optimization Focus:
- Clarify operational steps
- Supplement control points
- Establish method comparison tables
- Supplement typical cases
Template: See references/audit-book-templates.md → "Practical Operation Chapter Template"
Case Analysis Chapters
Characteristics: Presentation and analysis of audit cases
Optimization Focus:
- Improve case elements
- Supplement audit process
- Strengthen audit findings
- Expand audit insights (800-1500 words)
Audit Application Guidelines Template
Required Content (800-1500 words)
## 四、审计应用指引
### (一)范畴界定标准
1. **[界定维度1]**
- 标准描述:[标准]
- 判断依据:[依据]
- 法规支撑:**《[法规名]》**第X条
### (二)审计重点内容
1. **[重点1]**
- 审计要点:[要点]
- 审计方法:[方法]
- 法规依据:**《[法规名]》**第X条
### (三)审计方法步骤
1. **[步骤1]**
- 操作要点:[要点]
- 注意事项:[事项]
- 法规要求:**《[法规名]》**第X条
### (四)常见问题处理
1. **[问题1]**
- 问题描述:[问题]
- 处理方法:[方法]
- 法规依据:**《[法规名]》**第X条
Audit Case Insights Template
Required Content (800-1500 words)
**审计启示**:(800-1500字)
本案例体现了审计的以下重要价值:
**第一,理论价值**。(200-300字)
[阐述案例的理论意义]
**第二,实践价值**。(200-300字)
[阐述案例的实践参考价值]
**第三,方法借鉴**。(200-300字)
[阐述可借鉴的审计方法]
**第四,风险警示**。(200-300字)
[阐述需要警惕的风险点]
Standard Format for Legal Citation
Single Legal Citation
**《[法规全称]》**([年份] [修正/修订/通过])第[条款号]条
Multiple Clause Citation
**《[法规全称]》**第X条、第Y条、第Z条规定:
Clause Content Citation
根据**《[法规全称]》**第X条规定:
"[条款内容]"
Issue-Law Comparison Table
**表X-X 审计问题法规依据对照表**
| 审计问题 | 法规依据 | 条款内容 | 问题性质 |
|---------|---------|---------|---------|
| [问题1] | **《[法规]》**第X条 | [内容] | [性质] |
Quality Checklist
A-Level Optimization Standards (Audit Books)
- Use the laws and regulations database for legal query and verification
- Complete 4 rounds of review and generate review records
- Supplement at least 2 theoretical bases (academic definitions or international standards)
- Establish at least 3 framework tables (concept framework, classification comparison, standard comparison)
- Establish an issue-law comparison table
- Write audit application guidelines (800-1500 words)
- Supplement typical cases, with audit insights for each case (800-1500 words)
- All legal citations are complete, accurate, and standardized
- All data are accompanied by source annotations
- Character count controlled at 95%-120% of the original manuscript (revision mode)
- Quality improved by at least +1.5 levels
- Preserve the core viewpoints and connotations of the original manuscript (revision mode)
Reference File Description
references/audit-knowledge-base.md
When to Use: When it is necessary to query audit domain knowledge or legal database information
Contents Included:
- Location and structure of the laws and regulations knowledge base
- Statistical information on 100 laws and regulations
- List of core laws and regulations (Top 10)
- Usage methods for legal query tools
- Standard format for legal citation
- Auditing Standards System
- Auditing Terminology Comparison Table
- Audit Case Data Sources
- Statistical Data Sources
- Academic Citation Standards
- Data Verification Priority
- Prohibited Actions List
references/audit-book-templates.md
When to Use: When executing each round of review and generating output files
Includes:
- Output File Organization Structure
- Four-Round Review Standards (for auditing books)
- Auditing Book Chapter Templates (theoretical foundation type, practical operation type)
- Optimized Draft Template (revision mode)
- Standard Format for Legal Citations
- Standard Format for Audit Cases
- Optimization Completion Standards (Grade A standards)
Workflow
Revision Mode Workflow
- Read the original manuscript
- Execute Round 1 review: content accuracy → generate review record
- Execute Round 2 review: logical coherence → generate review record
- Execute Round 3 review: applicability → generate review record
- Execute Round 4 review: format standardization → generate review record
- Summarize the four rounds of review → generate comprehensive optimization notes
- Select typical optimization cases → generate optimization comparison
- Based on the comprehensive optimization notes → generate optimized draft
- Summarize results and improvements → generate completion report
Restructuring Mode Workflow
- Read the original manuscript
- Extract academic viewpoints → generate academic viewpoint confirmation document
- Wait for user confirmation
- Propose structural optimization plan → generate structural optimization plan document
- Wait for user confirmation
- Execute Round 1 review: content accuracy → generate review record
- Execute Round 2 review: logical coherence → generate review record
- Execute Round 3 review: applicability → generate review record
- Execute Round 4 review: format standardization → generate review record
- Summarize the four rounds of review → generate comprehensive optimization notes
- Select typical optimization cases → generate optimization comparison
- Based on the comprehensive optimization notes → generate optimized draft (restructured version)
- Summarize results and improvements → generate completion report
Common Issue Handling
Q1: How to look up laws and regulations?
A: Use the Grep tool to search in the legal database
Grep -pattern "关键词" -path="references/laws-database/*.md"
Q2: How to cite laws and regulations?
A: Use the standard format
**《[法规全称]》**([年份] [修正/修订/通过])第[条款号]条
Q3: How many words should the audit application guidelines contain?
A: 800-1500 words, including four parts: scope definition standards, key audit content, audit methods and steps, and common issue handling.
Q4: How many words should the case insights contain?
A: 800-1500 words, elaborated from four aspects: theoretical value, practical value, methodological reference, and risk warning.
Q5: What to do if the word count exceeds the limit?
A:
- < 95%: Supplement important missing content
-
120%: Delete redundant expressions, streamline repetitive content
Skill Features
- Highly professional: Designed specifically for auditing book writing
- Legal database integration: 100 laws and regulations knowledge base
- Four-round review: accuracy, logic, applicability, standardization
- Dual-mode support: Revision mode (conservative optimization) and reconstruction mode (major adjustments)
- Multi-file traceability: 5 review files + 1 optimized draft
- Template refinement: Standard templates for audit application guidelines, case insights, legal citations, etc.
- Quality assurance: Grade A optimization standard, quality improvement +1.5 levels
Target audience: Audit book authors, audit researchers, audit practitioners Primary uses: Audit book chapter optimization, audit guide writing, audit case analysis