First read the domain CLAUDE.md. Build an input card: legal status of the procuring entity, source of funds, project/subject matter, budget or estimated amount, place of implementation, procurement method, announcement time, current stage, service role. When decisive fields are missing, list candidate regimes and their differences; do not force a choice.
Check the laws, administrative regulations, departmental rules, local thresholds, and the original project announcement applicable at the relevant point in time; verify item by item according to the competent authority, level of norm, applicable objects, and transition between old and new laws. Output a matrix of "candidate regime—applicable requirements—known facts—facts to be proven—source location—verification status", and give the procedural entry point and a list of next-step materials. Legal relationships, qualifications, complaint channels, and remedies are set out separately according to each regime.
For task_context、jurisdiction、temporal、actors、matter、claims_and_elements、authority_and_interpretation、proof、procedure、outcomes_and_enforcement、strategy_and_uncertainty、governance the twelve modules, judge one by one. For applicable items, give the minimum output; for non-applicable items, give the reasons relevant to this regime routing; for blocking items, write the gaps, the supplementary path, and the definitive conclusions that must be suspended. Distinguish four layers: original documents, verified facts, regime assessment, and procedural status.
Author and Source
- Author: CSlawyer
- Homepage:https://chenshi.ai
- Preparation method: legal-meta-skill; both the legal basis and the project rules must be rechecked at runtime.