draft

/draft

1. Load ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal-zh/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md → practice-area templates, jurisdiction, local rules, supervision style.
2. Use the following workflow.
3. Match the document type to the template. Gather facts from the case notes — flag if missing, never guess.
4. Apply jurisdiction formatting. Draft with inline [需补充事实]、[待核实]、[不确定] markers.
5. Output prominently prefixed with an AI-assisted label, student review checklist, and supervision routing.

/legal-clinic:draft 劳动争议仲裁申请书

/legal-clinic:draft 律师函

---

Drafting: First-Draft Document Generation

Purpose

Students spend a lot of time on first drafts of documents, but the educational value lies in analysis and strategy, not in formatting and writing "Dear Judge." This skill generates a first draft from case notes and practice-area templates, so the student's time is spent thinking.

Every draft is explicitly a starting point. Not final work product. The student analyzes and revises, the supervising attorney reviews, and only then can it be sent out.

Load context

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal-zh/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md → practice area, practice-area templates, jurisdiction (province + local court + any local rules on file), supervision style.

Case notes or intake summary for gathering facts.

Teaching check

Read the supervising attorney's guide for this practice area at ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal-zh/legal-clinic/guides/<实践领域>.md. Check the pedagogy_posture setting:

• guide(default): Produce structure and a checklist. Require the student to draft each section themselves. Give feedback on their drafts (register, reading level, required elements, omissions). Only provide a fill-in for a section after the student has attempted it once.
• assist： Produce work product. Flag items for student review. The student learns by reviewing and editing.
• teach： Do not produce work product. Require the student to draft it themselves. Give feedback. Ask guiding questions when the student is confused. Only after two attempts show a model paragraph, and only for the section they are confused about. Track the student's correct and incorrect points so the supervising attorney can see progress.

If there is no guide, use guide. If there is a guide but no posture is set, use guide。

Regardless of posture, output always includes: "Teaching mode: [assist/guide/teach]— set by the supervising attorney's guide. This means I [what the student did vs what the skill did]."

Jurisdiction assumptions. The draft assumes the province, court, and local rules set in CLAUDE.md. Caption format, service requirements, page limits, filing windows, and substantive rules differ materially across provinces and across different courts within the same province. If the matter involves a different court or a different province, confirm with your supervising attorney before relying on any formatting, deadline, or argument in the draft.

Workflow

Step 1: Which document?

Match the request to the clinic's template set (from ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal-zh/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md). Common setups by practice area:

Practice Area	Document
Labor disputes	Labor arbitration application, complaint, answer, evidence list, attorney's statement
Marriage and family	Divorce complaint, application for a protection order, application to modify child custody, property division agreement, application for evidence investigation and collection
Consumer rights	Attorney letter, complaint, statement of defense, application for withdrawal of lawsuit
Administrative disputes	Application for administrative reconsideration, administrative complaint, evidence list, attorney's statement
General litigation	Complaint template, statement of defense, power of attorney, notice of appearance, evidence index

If the requested document is not in the template set: "The clinic templates do not include [X]. I can try drafting from general principles, but please flag this prominently—it has not been adjusted for your practice area or jurisdiction. It is best to first ask [supervisor] whether a ready-made template exists."

Step 2: Gather the facts

Read the intake summary or case notes. For every fact the document requires: do we have it?

The document needs	Have it?	Source
[Fact]	✓ / ✗	[Intake / client document / to be obtained]

Missing necessary facts → do not guess. Flag as:[需补充事实：当事人的入职日期——从劳动合同或询问当事人获取]。

Step 3: Apply the jurisdiction

According to ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal-zh/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md jurisdiction:

• Document title format: provincial and local court rules. If local rules were included at cold start, use them. If not, use the provincial default and flag:[待核实文书标题：本地规则未加载——对照[法院]现行规则确认格式]
• Service requirements: who is served, how service is made, and the service deadline under court rules
• Local special rules: page limits, font requirements, and general provisions of each court. Apply those included; flag those not included.

Step 4: Draft

Use the practice area template. Fill in what can be filled in from the facts. Leave placeholders clearly visible—never fill in plausible-sounding but fabricated content.

For every legal assertion in the draft: the assertion is an assumption for the student to verify, not a conclusion guaranteed by the draft. Flag it accordingly.

Step 5: Flag uncertainty

Three types of inline flags:

• [需补充事实：...] — the document needs facts that are not in the case notes
• [待核实：...] — a legal or factual assertion that needs verification before filing
• [不确定：...] — the skill is genuinely uncertain; say so rather than guess

Step 6: Supervision routing

Filing a document with a court or agency is an act with legal consequences. The gate is the supervision workflow described in ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal-zh/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md , in ## 指导风格 , reinforced by the Part 0 identity check confirming that the licensed supervising attorney has the clinic settings. Regardless of which supervision style is chosen, court filings always go through supervisory review before filing.

According to ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal-zh/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md supervision style:

• Formal review queue: the draft enters the queue, and the student sees "queued for [supervisor]"
• Configurable flag: if that document type is a flag trigger (court filings usually are), the output includes "confirm with [supervisor] before filing"
• Lighter touch: standard safeguard labeling, with no additional gate—but court filings are still sent to the supervisor before filing under the clinic's existing supervision structure

Output

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  AI 辅助草稿 —— 需学生分析和指导律师审查
  这是起手点，不是最终工作成果。
  每个 [待核实] 和 [需补充事实] 标记必须在提交前解决。
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

[文件 —— 按实践领域模板格式，管辖地感知，内嵌标记]

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

## 学生审查清单

在将此稿展示给[指导老师]之前：

- [ ] 通读全文。它说的是你想说的吗？
- [ ] 每项事实：是否按当事人的实际文件核实准确，而非仅依据接待笔记？
- [ ] 每个 [待核实] 标记：已通过检索或删除解决
- [ ] 每个 [需补充事实] 标记：已用核实后的信息填充或该节已删除
- [ ] 法律理论：这是正确的论点吗？有无更好的论点？（那是你的分析，不是草稿的。）
- [ ] 管辖地：文书标题、送达、格式符合现行本地规则
- [ ] [按 CLAUDE.md 风格的指导步骤]

## 本草稿不做什么

- 它不决定策略。草稿遵循该文件类型最常见的方法——你决定这对这位当事人是否正确。
- 它不核验自己的法律断言。上述每项法律结论在你研究它之前都只是假设。
- 它不自行提交。[指导老师]审查，你按诊所程序提交。

---

**在本文件离开诊所前。** 这是供指导律师审查的学生草稿，不是最终信函、提交文件或表格。将其提交至法院或机构，或发送给当事人或对立方，会对当事人产生法律后果。持证指导律师在文件离开诊所前审查、编辑并签字。仅在签字后剥离 AI 辅助草稿头。未经指导老师批准，不得发送或提交本草稿。

*参照中国法学院法律诊所实践规范、《律师执业管理办法》及《法律援助法》相关规定：生成式 AI 在法律实践中的使用要求胜任能力（competence）、指导监督（supervision）和核实（verification）。本草稿的设计目的是接受监督和核实——而非不经此过程即被信任。*

What this skill does not do

• Produce a final work product. Only a first draft. The student revises, and the supervisor reviews.
• Guess missing facts. Flag them for student access.
• Decide the legal theory. Use common methods; students judge whether that is correct for the case.
• Alternative jurisdiction-specific retrieval. Apply collected local rules; flag where rules are not collected or may have changed.