First read the domain CLAUDE.md, use the method of regime-triage to verify the rules; when the user already has a documented institutional conclusion, directly review its scope of application. Establish a document list and version chain, record the page/clause locations of the tender notice, clarifications, attachments, responses, qualification certificates, and final documents; the originals are read-only.
Map item by item according to "statutory admission—conditions set by the notice/documents themselves—response evidence—scoring clauses—contractual obligations." Focus on checking the legality and discriminatory nature of qualification conditions, substantial responsiveness, consistency of evaluation standards, conditions for invalid responses, quotation arithmetic and handling of abnormally low prices, boundaries of clarification, confidentiality and conflicts of interest. If evidence is lacking, fill in "pending verification"; do not automatically record zero points or qualification; only when genuine scoring records and applicable rules are complete may recalculation be performed, and do not simulate real evaluator results.
Output issue matrix:issue_id｜文件版本与定位｜条件/条款｜证据状态｜风险与法律依据｜建议动作｜责任人/时点｜核验状态. Also list the top three items most likely to change the result, the opposing explanation, and uncovered documents. All limits, scoring rules, and deadlines are to be verified in this task according to official sources.
Check one by one task_context、jurisdiction、temporal、actors、matter、claims_and_elements、authority_and_interpretation、proof、procedure、outcomes_and_enforcement、strategy_and_uncertainty、governance. This skill focuses on expanding subject qualification, requirements, evidence, procedure, and uncertainty; other modules still record status, reasons, or obstruction paths.
Author and Source
- Author: CSlawyer
- Homepage:https://chenshi.ai
- Preparation method: legal-meta-skill; both legal bases and project rules must be reviewed at runtime.