SuperAPI AI Directory

create-skill

Marketing & growth

View repository

Updated 10-15 20:28

About this skill

/create-skill — Turn a workflow, brief, or chat into a skill

Replaces the prior add-skill. Primary use case: you've been iterating on a workflow in conversation (like this entire session) and now want to formalize it. Secondary: scaffold from a brief / data dump / fresh idea.

Step 1 — Pick input mode

Invocation Mode What it means
/create-skill (mid-conversation) from-chat (default) Extract the skill from the workflow we've been discussing in this session. The most common case.
/create-skill from-video <url-or-path> from-video Corey recorded a Loom / Zoom / screen-share of himself doing a process. Skill calls watch-video (visual mode) to get transcript + key visual moments, then synthesizes the workflow into a SKILL.md. Best for visual workflows hard to describe in text.
/create-skill from-dump + pasted content from-dump User provides a brief, prior conversation transcript, exported chat, or notes. Skill structures it.
/create-skill from-scratch <name> from-scratch Fresh idea with no source material — interactive Q&A to flesh it out (the prior add-skill behavior).

If unspecified and there's substantive recent conversation, default to from-chat. If the conversation is empty/short, ask which mode.

Step 2 — Defer to Anthropic / community guidance for the schema

Don't reinvent SKILL.md format rules. For canonical guidance on frontmatter, description-writing, references/ structure, and skill best practices, this skill leans on:

  • compound-engineering:create-agent-skill (agent) — expert guidance for creating + editing Claude Code skills
  • compound-engineering:skill-creator (skill) — deeper guide for effective skills
  • compound-engineering:heal-skill (skill) — for fixing existing skills
  • anthropics/skills — official Anthropic examples
  • agentskills.io — the open Agent Skills specification

Call those skills directly (Skill({skill: "compound-engineering:create-agent-skill", ...})) when in doubt about format, or to pressure-test a draft SKILL.md.

This skill (create-skill) is the orchestrator for Corey's specific workflow: which repo, which conventions, which cross-references. The format expertise lives in the references above.

Step 3 — Pick target repo

Ask which sibling plugin this belongs in:

Repo What lives here Path
makerskills Personal cross-cutting operator work ~/code/makerskills/
cf-skills Conversion Factory agency operations ~/code/cf-skills/
marketingskills Generic marketing tactics (public) ~/code/marketingskills/
nonfictionskills Writing a nonfiction book ~/code/nonfictionskills/
fictionskills Writing fiction ~/code/fictionskills/
youtubeskills Making YouTube videos ~/code/youtubeskills/

Infer if obvious (a skill about pricing strategy → marketingskills; a skill about Riverside transcript prep → youtubeskills). Ask if ambiguous.

Step 4 — Synthesize per mode

from-chat

  1. Read backward through this conversation. Look for: a workflow Corey did multiple times, a process he keeps explaining, opinions he restated, decisions he made about tooling/voice/output formats.
  2. Identify the load-bearing pieces:
    • What's the trigger? (When does Corey want this?)
    • What are the steps?
    • What references / sources matter?
    • What does success look like (output format)?
    • What's the voice / convention?
  3. Surface what's not in the chat — gaps that need clarification before scaffolding. Ask 2–4 tight questions before writing.
  4. Draft the SKILL.md from the synthesis. Cite chat moments inline as you go ("Per your 2026-06-17 message about X…") so Corey can verify.

from-dump

  1. Parse the dump — could be a Notion page, a Slack thread, a Loom transcript, a brief from a teammate, an exported ChatGPT conversation.
  2. Apply the same synthesis logic as from-chat — what's the trigger, steps, references, output, voice.
  3. Cite the dump in the SKILL.md (where in the dump did each rule come from).

from-video

The pattern: record a workflow once, AI converts to skill. Best for visual processes that are hard to describe in text — clicking through specific apps, UI flows, browser-based workflows, multi-tool stitching.

  1. Take the input — a Loom / Zoom / Riverside / YouTube URL or a local MP4 file. Corey just hits record while doing the process and explains as he goes.
  2. Call watch-video <url> visual — get the transcript AND key visual moments (UI changes, decisions, tool switches). visual mode is the default here, not transcript, because the screen state matters as much as the words.
  3. Read the watch-video outputs:
    • <workdir>/transcript.txt — what was said
    • <workdir>/moments.md — what was on screen at each timestamp
    • <workdir>/summary.md — synthesized overview
  4. Synthesize the workflow:
    • Trigger: what was Corey doing when he started recording? (Often said in the first 30 seconds.)
    • Steps: map from the visual moments + matching transcript. Each major UI change or decision = a step.
    • Tools used: which apps appeared on screen. Note any API keys, files, URLs referenced.
    • Decision points: moments where the transcript said "now if X, do Y; if Z, do this instead" — encode as conditional logic in the skill.
    • Output / success: what did the final state look like? (Often the last few seconds.)
    • Voice / cadence: how Corey talks through the process — that's the skill's voice baseline.
  5. Surface gaps — anything ambiguous in the video that needs clarification (e.g., "you said 'use the usual template' — which one?"). Ask 2–4 tight questions.
  6. Draft the SKILL.md — cite video moments inline by timestamp: "Per the demo at 00:01:32, after clicking 'Create', the skill should..."
  7. Optionally also save to second-brain as call-<slug>.md or note-<slug>.md so the source video is captured alongside the skill it produced.

Heuristic: if Corey's recording is >10 minutes, the process is probably too big for one skill. Suggest splitting before drafting.

from-scratch

Interactive Q&A — the prior add-skill flow:

  1. Name — kebab-case, verb-noun preferred (matches watch-video, read-book, add-skill)
  2. One-line purpose
  3. Trigger phrases
  4. Initial reference files?
  5. Composes with which other skills?

Step 5 — Generate the frontmatter

---
name: <kebab-case>
description: <rich, trigger-rich, ~2–4 sentences. Lead with "When you want to..." Include 4–8 trigger phrases in quotes. Differentiate from adjacent skills if relevant.>
metadata:
  version: 0.1.0
---

Description rules (load-bearing — Claude routes by description match):

  • Lead with the use case ("When you want to X…")
  • Include explicit trigger phrases the user might say
  • Differentiate from sibling skills if there's overlap
  • Mention key references the skill loads
  • Keep under ~500 characters

For deeper description-writing guidance, consult compound-engineering:skill-creator.

Step 6 — Scaffold the directory

<target-repo>/skills/<name>/
├── SKILL.md            # the synthesized skill
└── references/         # populate based on what the synthesis surfaced
    └── ...

Body follows the pattern of existing skills (pm, decide, second-brain, etc.):

  • # /<name> — <one-line purpose>
  • Numbered ## Step N — <phase> sections
  • Composes-with cross-references
  • Quality notes at the end

Step 7 — Update README, commit, push

Append to the target repo's README skill table:

| [`<name>`](./skills/<name>/SKILL.md) | <one-line purpose> |

Then:

cd <target-repo> && git add -A && git commit -m "Add <name> skill: <one-line purpose>" && git push

Report:

  • New skill path
  • Commit hash
  • Reminder: /plugin install or symlink may need a refresh

Step 8 — Offer follow-ups

After scaffolding:

  • "Want to flesh out a specific Step in the SKILL.md now, or come back to it?"
  • "Want me to run it through compound-engineering:heal-skill for a quality pass?"
  • "Should this skill compose with [adjacent skill]? Want me to add the cross-reference?"

Composes with

  • adapt-skill — for porting an EXTERNAL skill into your namespace (different job — that's adapting, this is creating). If Corey says "let's borrow that skill from gstack," use adapt-skill. If he says "let's encode what we just did," use this.
  • update-skill — sibling. Use that for improving EXISTING skills from learnings (not creating new).
  • watch-video — load-bearing for from-video mode. Visual-mode output (transcript + key visual moments + summary) is the input for skill synthesis. Always call in visual mode for process recordings — UI state matters as much as words.
  • compound-engineering:create-agent-skill (agent) — call into this for format and best-practices expertise
  • compound-engineering:skill-creator (skill) — same
  • compound-engineering:heal-skill (skill) — for QA pass on the generated skill
  • second-brain — optionally capture the source video as raw/call-<slug>.md (Loom/Zoom recording) or raw/note-<slug>.md (live walkthrough) so the source artifact lives alongside the skill it produced.

Notes on quality

  • Cite the source. Whether it's chat, dump, or interactive Q&A — the SKILL.md body should reference where each decision came from. This makes it easy to revise later.
  • Don't over-engineer v0.1. Ship a minimal SKILL.md + 1–2 references files. Iterate after Corey uses it once. Most generated skills are over-scoped.
  • Verb-noun naming when possible (matches watch-video, read-book, add-skill, etc.). Single-word noun names are fine for distinctive concepts (decide, pm, paste).
  • Always reference Anthropic's official guidance for the schema — don't invent format conventions.