This skill covers the agent lifecycle beyond basic tracing: architecture patterns, evaluation, metrics, and production monitoring. All examples use Opik for observability — for SDK details (tracing, integrations, span types), load the opik skill.
The Agent Lifecycle
- Instrument — Add Opik tracing to make your agent's behavior visible (see
opikskill) - Evaluate — Measure performance with datasets, metrics, and experiments
- Monitor — Track quality, cost, and reliability in production
- Optimize — Improve based on data from evaluation and production traces
Agent Architecture Patterns
Trace every component of your agent with appropriate span types:
import opik
@opik.track(name="research_agent") def agent(query: str) -> str: plan = plan_action(query) # general span results = execute_tool(plan) # tool span return generate_response(results) # llm span
@opik.track(type="tool") def execute_tool(action: dict) -> str: return search_web(action["query"])
@opik.track(type="llm") def generate_response(context: str) -> str: return llm_call(context)
### What to Trace
| Component | Span Type | Key Data |
|-----------|-----------|----------|
| Planning | `general` | Reasoning steps, decisions |
| Tool calls | `tool` | Tool name, parameters, results |
| LLM calls | `llm` | Prompt, response, tokens |
| Retrieval | `tool` | Query, documents |
| Validation | `guardrail` | Check results, pass/fail |
## Evaluation
Evaluate agents at multiple levels — end-to-end and per-component:
```python
from opik.evaluation import evaluate
from opik.evaluation.metrics import AnswerRelevance, Hallucination, AgentTaskCompletion
results = evaluate(
experiment_name="agent-v2",
dataset=dataset,
task=lambda item: {"output": agent(item["input"])},
scoring_metrics=[
AnswerRelevance(),
Hallucination(),
AgentTaskCompletion(),
]
)
Built-in Agent Metrics
| Metric | What It Measures |
|---|---|
AgentTaskCompletion |
Did the agent fulfill its task? |
AgentToolCorrectness |
Were tools used correctly? |
TrajectoryAccuracy |
Did actions match expected sequence? |
AnswerRelevance |
Does the answer address the question? |
Hallucination |
Are there unsupported claims? |
41 Total Built-in Metrics
Heuristic (Equals, Contains, BLEU, ROUGE, BERTScore, IsJson, etc.), LLM-as-Judge (AnswerRelevance, Hallucination, Usefulness, GEval, etc.), RAG (ContextPrecision, ContextRecall, Faithfulness), and conversation metrics. See references/evaluation.md for the full list.
Production Monitoring
- Dashboards — Visualize quality, cost, latency, and error trends
- Online evaluation — Automatically score production traces with LLM-as-Judge
- Alerts — Get notified when metrics deviate (quality drops, cost spikes, error rates)
- Guardrails — PII detection, topic validation, custom safety checks
- Opik Assist — AI-powered root cause analysis for failed traces
Common Anti-Patterns
| Category | Anti-Pattern |
|---|---|
| Reliability | Unbounded loops, retry storms, silent failures |
| Security | Prompt injection, privilege escalation, data leakage |
| Observability | Late tracing (missing input), orphaned spans |
| Tools | Tool loops, hallucinated tools, parameter errors |
Detailed References
| Topic | Reference File |
|---|---|
| Agent architecture, reliability, security patterns | references/agent-patterns.md |
| Evaluation datasets, experiments, all 41 metrics | references/evaluation.md |
| Production dashboards, alerts, guardrails, cost tracking | references/production.md |