carbon-monitor-adapt-harness

You are in a clone of Carbon Monitor. This skill produces one file, specs/<slug>/SPEC.md, that a later session implements from. It reads documentation and writes that file; it makes no code changes and runs no project scripts.

Load documents in stages, each at the step that needs it, and read a section rather than a file wherever a section is enough: find the heading, read to the next heading of the same level, stop. reading-map.md lists what each step and each SPEC section needs.

Step 1. Orient (one short read)

Read docs/HARNESS.md section 1 only: the loop and its three invariants. That is enough context to run the interview. Nothing else is read yet.

Step 2. Branch

Ask this, word for word, then wait:

Which of these are you doing? A. PR reviews for another repository, keeping the review job. B. A different job on this harness: scheduled, in IBM Cloud, with cost tracking, telemetry and a Slack report, against some other system.

Load interview/pr-review.md for A or interview/new-job.md for B. B is a larger adaptation than A; say so once.

Step 3. Interview

One question at a time, in the file's order, at most ten.
State the default with each question; accept "default".
Skip a question the user has already answered in any form.
If an answer names a worker agent other than Bob, note it. bob and claude are supported as built, so either is configuration only. Any other CLI needs an adapter (docs/HARNESS.md section 4, "Add an agent"); its agent file is read later, at the step that needs it.
Stop early when every SPEC section can be filled.

Step 4. Write the SPEC, pulling context section by section

Read reading-map.md, then templates/SPEC.md. Copy the template to specs/<slug>/SPEC.md (short kebab-case name for the adapted system), fill the header (the short SHA from git rev-parse --short HEAD, today's date) and fill the sections in order. For each SPEC section, read only the sources the map lists for it, at the granularity it lists, and do not read ahead for later sections. Rules:

Every row of the tables in docs/HARNESS.md sections 2 and 3 gets a decision in SPEC section 3.
Every file and function the SPEC cites as existing today is in the repository; cite the path. Confirm a name by searching for it, not by reading the file through. A name the SPEC introduces is marked as new: it sits in a replace or add row, in the New column of section 6, or in a task.
Branch B always fills section 6 with every name in docs/HARNESS.md section 5, old and new.
The invariants from step 1 stay unless section 9 states why one must change.
Acceptance criteria are testable given/when/then statements.
Tasks are ordered, small, and name their files and criteria.
Anything unsettled goes in section 13 with who decides. No guesses.

Step 5. Check, then finish

Every template section present, none left as a placeholder
A decision for every row of docs/HARNESS.md sections 2 and 3
Section 6 complete for B, or "none" for A with no renames (an agent other than Bob or Claude adds new names; see the reading map)
Every file or function cited as existing today found in the repository; every new name marked as new
Every open question has an owner

Print the SPEC path, the three highest-risk open questions, and this next step, then stop:

Start a fresh session and say: "Implement specs/<slug>/SPEC.md, one task at a time, verifying each against its acceptance criteria."