AIMS Audit Prep (ISO 42001)
Operational playbook for ISO 42001:2023 AI Management System (AIMS) audit preparation. Whether targeting initial certification, surveillance audit, or annual internal audit.
When to use this skill vs. iso42001-ai-management:
- This skill: audit imminent; need readiness sprint
- iso42001-ai-management: building AIMS from scratch; multi-quarter program
When to use this skill
| Situation |
Skill applies |
| ISO 42001 Stage 1 audit scheduled |
Yes — documentation review prep |
| Stage 2 (onsite/operational) audit |
Yes — operational evidence sprint |
| Annual surveillance audit |
Yes — surveillance prep |
| Internal AIMS audit |
Yes — internal audit playbook |
| AI Impact Assessment for new system |
Yes — scripts/ai_impact_assessment_checker.py |
| Building AIMS from scratch |
Use ra-qm-team/iso42001-ai-management |
ISO 42001 audit structure
Stage 1 (documentation review)
- Auditor reviews AIMS documentation (typically 1-3 days)
- Confirms scope, applicability, key documents present
- Identifies gaps before Stage 2
- Typically 2-3 weeks before Stage 2
Stage 2 (operational assessment)
- Auditor onsite (or remote) verifies AIMS operating effectively
- 3-10 days depending on scope + system count
- Walkthroughs, interviews, evidence sampling
- Conclusion: certification recommended (subject to non-conformity closure) or not
Surveillance audits
- Annual; reduced scope vs initial
- Typically 1-3 days
- Focus on high-risk areas + changes since prior audit
Re-certification (year 3)
- Full audit; similar to initial
- Typically every 3 years
AIMS audit-prep sprint
4-week sprint (mature AIMS, surveillance audit)
Week 1: Internal audit + gap analysis
Week 2: Remediation + AI inventory refresh
Week 3: Documentation review + walkthrough rehearsal
Week 4: Auditor onsite
8-week sprint (Stage 1 + Stage 2 initial certification)
Weeks 1-3: AIMS documentation completion (Annex A controls coverage)
Weeks 4-5: Stage 1 audit + gap closure
Weeks 6-7: Stage 2 operational evidence prep + mock walkthroughs
Week 8: Stage 2 audit
ISO 42001 clauses + Annex A controls
Clauses (4-10): management system
| Clause |
Topic |
| 4 |
Context of the organization |
| 5 |
Leadership |
| 6 |
Planning (including AI risk + AI objectives) |
| 7 |
Support (resources, competence, awareness, communication, documentation) |
| 8 |
Operation (AI lifecycle, supplier relationships) |
| 9 |
Performance evaluation (monitoring, internal audit, management review) |
| 10 |
Improvement (nonconformity, continual improvement) |
Annex A controls (10 areas)
| Annex A area |
Topics |
| A.2 |
Policies related to AI |
| A.3 |
Internal organization |
| A.4 |
Resources for AI systems |
| A.5 |
Assessing impacts of AI systems |
| A.6 |
AI system lifecycle |
| A.7 |
Data for AI systems |
| A.8 |
Information for interested parties |
| A.9 |
Use of AI systems |
| A.10 |
Third-party relationships |
Critical audit areas
AI Inventory + Impact Assessments
| Item |
Evidence |
Common gap |
| Complete AI system inventory |
Inventory document |
Shadow AI not captured |
| AI Impact Assessment (AIIA) per system |
Per-system AIIA |
Skipped for "low-risk" systems |
| AIIA reviewed periodically |
Review records |
One-time only |
| Risk classification of systems |
Per system |
Not documented |
AI Policy + Governance
| Item |
Evidence |
Common gap |
| AI policy approved + dated |
Signed policy |
Not signed / stale |
| AI ethics principles |
Documented principles |
Generic; not actionable |
| AI governance body |
Charter / minutes |
Not formalized |
| Roles + responsibilities |
RACI |
Not defined |
AI Lifecycle Management (Annex A.6)
| Item |
Evidence |
Common gap |
| AI development lifecycle defined |
Process documentation |
Not formalized |
| Data quality controls |
Per system |
Generic only |
| Model validation procedures |
Per system |
Validation skipped |
| AI system testing |
Per system |
Inadequate testing |
| Deployment controls |
Per system |
No controls |
| Operational monitoring |
Per system |
Drift not monitored |
| Decommissioning procedures |
Per system |
Not defined |
Data Governance (Annex A.7)
| Item |
Evidence |
Common gap |
| Data sources documented |
Per system |
Vague |
| Data quality assessed |
Quality metrics |
Not measured |
| Data lineage tracked |
Documentation |
Untracked |
| Sensitive data protection |
Controls |
Insufficient |
Third-party AI (Annex A.10)
| Item |
Evidence |
Common gap |
| Third-party AI inventory |
List |
Incomplete |
| Vendor due diligence for AI |
Per vendor |
Generic IT only |
| Contract terms for AI vendors |
AI-specific clauses |
Standard MSA only |
Clarify First
Before running the audit-prep, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
- Audit type and stage — Stage 1 documentation review, Stage 2 operational, surveillance, or internal (sets sprint length and whether the focus is documentation or operational evidence)
- AIMS maturity — mature system vs building from gaps (picks the 4-week vs 8-week sprint)
- AI systems in scope — which systems and how many (drives the AIIA count and Annex A coverage)
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the readiness assessment.
Quick start
- Run readiness score:
python3 scripts/aims_readiness_score.py --config aims-controls.yaml
- Check AIIA per system:
python3 scripts/ai_impact_assessment_checker.py --aiia system-aiia.yaml
- Pick sprint length based on score
- Execute sprint per references/iso42001-aims-readiness-checklist.md
Common AIMS audit findings
- AI inventory incomplete — shadow AI not captured
- AIIA missing for systems that look "small" but have impact
- AI lifecycle process not implemented (designed only)
- Data governance generic — not AI-specific
- Performance monitoring missing — drift not detected
- AI policy stale — written before current AI deployment
- Third-party AI vendors not assessed
- Continual improvement not evidenced
Tooling
| Script |
Purpose |
scripts/aims_readiness_score.py |
Score AIMS readiness per clause + Annex A area |
scripts/ai_impact_assessment_checker.py |
Validate AI Impact Assessment completeness |
References
Related skills
ra-qm-team/iso42001-ai-management — deep ISO 42001 AIMS program management
ra-qm-team/eu-ai-act-specialist — EU AI Act regulatory companion
ra-qm-team/audit-prep/ai-act-readiness — AI Act audit-prep variant
ra-qm-team/audit-prep/compliance-readiness — multi-framework readiness