Data dependencies and execution prerequisites
It is recommended to use Wind wind-mcp-skill to obtain the underlying data. Before execution, first check whether wind-mcp-skillalready exists locally; if not, prompt the user to install it:
# GitHub
npx skills add Wind-Information-Co-Ltd/wind-skills --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y
# Gitee 镜像（国内）
npx skills add https://gitee.com/wind_info/wind-skills.git --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y
Skill positioning
This skill is used to organize "which sectors are strengthening, which sectors are falling behind, where capital is flowing from and to, and whether the rotation is sustainable" into a structured judgment. The output focus is not simply listing gain/loss rankings, but helping users identify the market mainline, judge whether style switching is taking hold, and provide directions that should be closely tracked subsequently.
Execution process
Step 1: Confirm the observed market, time window, and judgment objective
First confirm the market scope, time window, and purpose of use covered by this judgment:
- Whether to look at A-shares, Hong Kong stocks, US stocks, or cross-market comparison
- Whether to observe the past 1 day, past 1 week, past 1 month, or a longer period
- Whether it is for after-hours review, weekly strategy update, or finding the mainline for the next stage
- Whether the user is more concerned about short-term strength shifts or medium-term style migration
If the user does not specify, default mainly to "the sector rotation situation in the current market over the past week to one month," while taking into account both short-term and medium-term levels.
Step 2: Establish a sector strength tiering framework
First organize the major sectors, industries, or themes in the market into tiers, focusing on observing:
- Whether the recent strongest directions are concentrated in a few sectors
- Whether strong sectors are strengthening uniformly internally, or are driven only by a few leaders
- Whether weak sectors are continuing to weaken, or are in a stage of stabilizing and repairing
- Whether the relative strength of styles such as cyclical, growth, consumer, financial, and defensive is changing
The goal of this stage is to first answer "what is the distribution of strength and weakness," rather than rushing to give rotation conclusions.
Step 3: Identify clues of capital switching and style migration
After the strength tiering is clear, further judge whether capital is undergoing substantive migration, focusing mainly on:
- Whether capital is doing high-low switching within the high-level mainline, or flowing across styles
- Whether gains in strong sectors are accompanied by increased trading activity
- Whether market preference is shifting from defense to offense, or switching back from offense to defense
- Whether sector rotation is diffusion in a broad rally environment, or relay rotation under a stock-game environment
It is necessary to combine "price performance" with "capital absorption," to avoid misjudging a single-day anomaly as trend-based rotation.
Step 4: Explain the drivers behind the rotation
After confirming signs of rotation, analyze the driving reasons, prioritizing breakdown from the following categories of factors:
- The impact of changes in macroeconomic expectations on style preference
- Catalysts brought by industry trends, earnings expectations, or valuation repair
- Phased boosts to certain sectors from policy, regulation, or event stimuli
- Institutional position adjustment, passive fund rebalancing, or redistribution after trading crowding
If multiple factors act together, distinguish the main driver from secondary drivers, and avoid piling up all factors in parallel.
Step 5: Judge the sustainability and transmission direction of the rotation
Further judge which category this rotation belongs to:
- New mainline launch
- Old mainline repair
- Internal diffusion within a strong theme
- Catch-up rally under high-low switching
- Purely trading-driven short-term noise
Also explain which direction rotation is more likely to transmit next:
- Leaders continue to strengthen
- Core and second-tier names catch up
- Upstream transmits to downstream, or downstream feeds back to upstream
- Style spreads from local to broader market
Step 6: Form the final sector rotation judgment
The final output should let users quickly know where the current market mainline is, whether the rotation is solid, which directions are worth continuing to watch, and which directions are not suitable for chasing highs. The final draft should retain only conclusions, evidence, and a tracking framework, without showing the internal retrieval process.
Output structure
{Market scope} Sector Rotation Radar ({YYYY-MM-DD})
I. 30-second conclusion
- Current strongest mainline: {sector or theme}
- Current most obvious rotation direction: {content}
- Style judgment: {offensive / defensive / oscillating switch}
- Sustainability judgment: {strong / average / weak}
II. Sector strength snapshot
| Sector/Theme | Current status | Strength change | Rotation nature | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {Sector 1} | {Leading / repairing / pulling back} | {Strengthening / flat / weakening} | {Main uptrend / catch-up / rotation retreat} | {Explanation} |
| {Sector 2} | {Status} | {Change} | {Nature} | {Explanation} |
| {Sector 3} | {Status} | {Change} | {Nature} | {Explanation} |
III. Capital switching and style migration
- Capital flow summary: {content}
- Style switching clues: {content}
- Internal high-low switching: {content}
IV. Breakdown of rotation drivers
- Primary driver: {content}
- Secondary driver: {content}
- Short-term disturbance factors: {content}
V. Subsequent transmission paths
- Directions more likely to continue strengthening: {content}
- Directions that may see catch-up gains: {content}
- Rotation retreat directions to watch out for: {content}
VI. Tracking list
- {Observation point 1}
- {Observation point 2}
- {Observation point 3}
Quality requirements
- Rotation analysis must cover strength tiers, capital migration, and driver explanation at the same time; it cannot only rank gains and losses.
- It is necessary to distinguish between “single-day abnormal movement” and “stage rotation” to avoid mistakenly writing noise as a trend.
- The three levels of mainline, catch-up, and rotation retreat need to be clearly defined to facilitate subsequent action.
- If the rotation evidence is insufficient, it should clearly state that “a clear mainline has still not formed,” and a conclusion must not be forced.
- The output should serve direction judgment and continued tracking, rather than being written as a general market overview.