pullback_opportunity_finder_skill

Pullback Opportunity Finder Skill

Data dependencies and execution prerequisites

It is recommended to use Wind wind-mcp-skill to obtain underlying data. Before execution, first check whether wind-mcp-skillalready exists locally; if not, prompt the user to install:

# GitHub
npx skills add Wind-Information-Co-Ltd/wind-skills --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y

# Gitee 镜像（国内）
npx skills add https://gitee.com/wind_info/wind-skills.git --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y

Skill positioning

This skill is used to screen candidate stocks whose main upward logic is still intact, whose trend has not yet been broken, but whose price has undergone a phased pullback. The output focus is not to mechanically look for stocks with large declines, but to identify which pullbacks are healthy consolidations and which are merely downward continuation before a weak rebound, thereby helping users base "dip buying" on judgments of trend and structure.

Function overview

The core function of this skill is: to seek candidate stocks that have pulled back sufficiently but whose trend has not been broken, and to locate dip-buying observation zones.

It emphasizes combining trend integrity, pullback depth, support signals, catalyst continuity, and risk boundaries into an integrated assessment, avoiding mistaking all declines for opportunities.

Use cases

• After a strong sector pulls back, it is necessary to determine which individual stocks are still worth continuing to track.
• The user wants to find opportunities for a "second entry" rather than chasing highs.
• The trading team needs to update the dip-buying watchlist intraday or at the end of the day.
• Users with existing positions want to distinguish normal pullbacks from trend weakening.

Working principles

1. The premise of a pullback opportunity is that the original main trend is still valid; one cannot look only at the decline while ignoring the trend.
2. It is necessary to distinguish among three types of pullbacks: "strong consolidation," "trend destruction," and "sentiment washout."
3. All dip-buying conclusions should be accompanied by observation ranges, confirmation signals, and stop-error boundaries.
4. If a pullback lacks support or the catalyst is disproved, it should be prioritized as risk rather than opportunity.
5. The main text only presents analysis results and does not explicitly describe internal implementation details.

Execution process

Step 1: Confirm the stock pool and the definition of pullback

First clarify which type of pullback opportunity is being sought this time:

• It is the technical pullback of previous leading stocks
• It is the quick recovery opportunity of trending stocks after a news shock
• It is looking for the few strong stocks that remain resilient after a sector retreat
• Or is it a phased washout opportunity within a medium-term main upward wave

At the same time, confirm whether the user is focused on daily-level, weekly-level, or shorter-cycle pullbacks.

Step 2: Confirm whether the original trend is valid

For candidate stocks, first review whether the rise before the pullback had a real trend foundation:

• Whether there was a continuous strong structure rather than an impulse rally
• Whether there is support from main lines such as earnings, prosperity, policy, and theme reinforcement
• Whether the volume-price relationship during the rising phase was healthy
• Whether the stock historically has behavioral characteristics of continuing to strengthen after a pullback

If the original rise itself lacked trend quality, subsequent pullbacks should not easily be defined as opportunities.

Step 3: Assess whether the pullback depth and pace are healthy

The focus of a healthy pullback is not "falling enough," but "retreating in an orderly manner." Observe:

• Whether the pullback magnitude is still within an acceptable range relative to the previous rise
• Whether the pullback pace is a sharp decline washout or a mild low-volume consolidation
• Whether the pullback process breaks below important moving averages, the lower edge of a platform, or key lows
• Whether there is obvious volume surge out of control or chip stampede during the decline

If the pullback is too deep and the rhythm is unbalanced, priority should be given to shifting to risk observation rather than a low-buy candidate.

Step 4: Identify support zones and absorption signals

Pullback opportunities must be tied to specific price zones and behavioral signals. Key confirmations:

• Which zone may form effective support
• Whether, when falling back into the support zone, there is shrinking-volume stabilization, lower-shadow repair, or proactive absorption
• Whether stocks in the same sector simultaneously show signs of stabilizing
• If there is a rebound, whether the rebound quality shows that funds are willing to re-enter

Without absorption, there is only decline; price merely approaching support does not mean an opportunity has appeared.

Step 5: Verify whether the catalyst is still effective

The key to a valid low buy is that the original main line has not been fundamentally damaged. Re-verify:

• Whether the core narrative driving the rise still holds
• Whether the pullback stems from staged profit-taking rather than weakening fundamentals
• Whether there is still an event window in the coming period that could continue to strengthen the logic
• Whether market preference has already switched away from this style

If the catalyst has clearly become dull or changed in the opposite direction, the priority for low buying should be lowered.

Step 6: Distinguish between the "observation zone" and the "confirmation point"

A high-quality low buy does not mean buying as soon as the level is reached, but rather breaking the process into two layers:

• Observation zone: the stock price enters a price area worthy of close monitoring
• Confirmation point: evidence appears of volume-price repair, sector resonance, or renewed strengthening

At the same time, clearly write out:

• Under what circumstances the tracking level can be upgraded
• Under what circumstances the original low-buy judgment should be abandoned
• If the optimal position is missed, whether there is still a second entry opportunity

Step 7: Form candidate ranking and strategy recommendations

Rank candidates comprehensively by "trend integrity + pullback health + absorption quality + catalyst continuity," and clearly distinguish:

• Pullback opportunities that can be actively observed
• Observation targets suitable only for waiting for confirmation
• Risk targets where the pullback appears sufficient but should not actually be bought on dips

Step 8: Integrate into a final pullback opportunity draft

The final output should help users know "which stocks can be waited on, where to wait, what signals to watch, and under what circumstances to stop waiting." The main text should present only conclusions, evidence, and the observation framework, without showing intermediate drafts.

Output structure

---

Pullback opportunity screening ({YYYY-MM-DD})

I. 30-second conclusion

• Pullback targets most worthy of attention: {name list}
• Currently healthiest pullback type: {mild consolidation / rapid clearing / platform pullback}
• Overall strategy bias: {actively wait for confirmation / observe only / no low buying for now}
• Biggest risk point: {one sentence}

II. Candidate pool overview

Stock	Original trend quality	Current pullback nature	Support zone	Confirmation signal	Priority
{Target 1}	{strong/medium/weak}	{healthy/average/weak}	{zone}	{content}	{A/B/C}
{Target 2}	{level}	{nature}	{range}	{content}	{level}

III. Breakdown of Key Candidates

{stock name}

• Original mainline: {content}
• Reason for this pullback: {content}
• Support observation zone: {content}
• Absorption signal: {content}
• Conditions for upgrade confirmation: {content}
• Invalidation boundary: {content}

IV. Sector and Environment Assessment

• Status of the sector it belongs to: {content}
• Whether the market style supports buying on dips: {content}
• Whether it has the foundation for a second strengthening: {content}

V. Observation and Response Checklist

• {observation point 1}
• {observation point 2}
• {observation point 3}

VI. Risk Disclosure

• {risk 1}
• {risk 2}
• {risk 3}

---

Quality requirements

1. Pullback candidates must be based on the premise that the original trend remains valid.
2. A support observation zone and confirmation signal must be given; vague direction alone is not allowed.
3. A distinction must be made between "the pullback has reached position" and "the pullback has ended."
4. If the pullback has already evolved into trend destruction, the buy-on-dips logic should be explicitly rejected.
5. The output must serve subsequent observation and disciplined execution, and avoid being written as general market commentary.