Data dependencies and execution prerequisites
It is recommended to use Wind wind-mcp-skill to obtain underlying data. Before execution, first check whether there is already a local wind-mcp-skill; if not, prompt the user to install:
# GitHub
npx skills add Wind-Information-Co-Ltd/wind-skills --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y
# Gitee 镜像(国内)
npx skills add https://gitee.com/wind_info/wind-skills.git --skill wind-mcp-skill -g -y
Skill positioning
This skill is used, based on a growth stock selection framework, to screen from a large number of stocks strong candidates with "fundamental growth, strengthening market expectations, leading price performance, and favorable supply-demand structure." The output focus is not to mechanically label classical methodologies, but to integrate growth quality, performance acceleration, relative strength, and market capital preferences into a practical screening framework.
Function overview
The core function of this skill is: use a growth stock methodology to batch screen for strong targets where fundamentals and price action resonate.
It emphasizes combining growth, expectations, strength, supply-demand, and market mainlines in judgment, helping users form a growth stock candidate pool closer to the logic of "the strong remain strong."
Use cases
- Growth stock investors need to quickly identify, within a batch of stocks, the objects that best fit the profile of strong growth.
- After earnings season or during a stage of strengthening prosperity, it is necessary to batch update the growth candidate pool.
- The user wants to consider both fundamental growth and market strength, rather than looking at only a single dimension.
- The team needs to conduct structured screening within an industry of "who is strongest and why."
Working principles
- Growth stock screening must consider both operating acceleration and market confirmation, and cannot look only at performance growth rates.
- Relative price strength is an outcome and also a screening condition, but it cannot be used separately from fundamentals.
- Attention should be paid to supply-demand structure and free-float characteristics, avoiding looking only at static financial indicators.
- The methodology should serve practical screening, not be written as term explanations.
- The main text does not explicitly mention the internal invocation process.
Execution process
Step 1: Confirm the screening scope and definition of growth
First clarify whether this scan is more oriented toward:
- Leader screening in high-growth industries
- Cross-industry horizontal scanning for strong growth stocks
- Earnings-driven growth stocks showing clear acceleration in recent quarters
- Or prosperity growth stocks under theme strengthening
At the same time, confirm whether the user values profit growth, revenue growth, or a composite profile of "growth + relative strength" more.
Step 2: First screen operating growth and direction of change
The first layer of growth stocks is whether operating variables are improving. Focus on judging:
- Whether revenue, profit, profit margin, or core business indicators are accelerating
- Whether growth comes from real demand expansion or one-off fluctuations
- Whether current growth is still improving rather than having already peaked
- Whether the company has the foundation to support continued high prosperity for the next several quarters
Step 3: Combine market expectations and earnings verification
Whether a growth stock is worth tracking depends not only on the statements, but also on whether the market is willing to revise expectations upward. Judge:
- Whether recent earnings reports or operating updates have continued to strengthen market expectations
- Whether management guidance and industry feedback support continued upward revisions ahead
- Whether the market previously underestimated the strength of growth
- If expectations are already very high, whether there is still sufficient room for further upward revision
Step 4: Check relative strength and leadership attributes
Growth stock selection must also take market confirmation into account. Key things to watch:
- Whether price performance is significantly stronger than the broad market, the industry, and similar stocks
- Whether the strength is steady progress or a one-off spike after sharp fluctuations
- Whether it has the attribute of leading capital focus within the sector
- Over the past period, whether pullbacks have been short and strong and advances have had more slope
Step 5: Assess supply-demand structure and trading characteristics
Many growth stocks fail to become strong not because the logic is flawed, but because the supply-demand structure does not cooperate. Observe:
- Whether float, turnover, and chip structure support trend continuation
- Whether there is excessive crowding or obvious pressure to cash out
- Whether market preference for this growth style is rising
- Whether it currently looks more like an "institutional slow bull" or a "theme-style quick rise and quick fall"
Step 6: Identify the real priority differences
Rank candidates comprehensively by "growth acceleration + expectation revision capability + relative strength + supply-demand structure" and distinguish:
- Core strong growth stocks
- Suboptimal targets with good logic but still awaiting confirmation
- Observation targets whose financial growth looks attractive but has not yet been confirmed by the market
Step 7: Supplement risks and failure modes
Growth stock screening must actively consider failure modes, such as:
- High growth is unsustainable
- Valuation is overdrawn too quickly
- Market style shifts to defensive
- Deterioration of supply-demand structure leads to interruption of strength
Step 8: Integrate into a finished strong growth stock draft
The final output should let users know "who best fits the strong growth stock profile, why, whom to continue following, and whom to avoid." The main text should present only conclusions, rationale, and the follow-up observation framework.
Output structure
Strong Growth Stock Screening ({YYYY-MM-DD})
I. 30-second conclusion
- Strongest growth candidate: {name list}
- Most core advantage dimension: {growth acceleration / expectation revision / relative strength / supply-demand advantage}
- Overall judgment: {actively track / selectively focus / cautiously layer}
- Main risk: {one sentence}
II. Candidate pool overview
| Stock | Growth quality | Expectation revision space | Relative strength | Supply-demand structure | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {Target 1} | {Strong/Medium/Weak} | {High/Medium/Low} | {Strong/Medium/Weak} | {Excellent/Medium/Weak} | {A/B/C} |
| {Target 2} | {rating} | {rating} | {rating} | {rating} | {rating} |
III. Breakdown of key candidates
{Stock name}
- Growth main line: {content}
- Why the market is willing to pay a premium: {content}
- Strongest confirmation signal: {content}
- Variables still requiring observation: {content}
- Failure mode: {content}
IV. Tracking checklist
- {Tracking point 1}
- {Tracking Point 2}
- {Tracking Point 3}
V. Risk Warnings
- {Risk 1}
- {Risk 2}
- {Risk 3}
Quality Requirements
- Both lines of business growth and market confirmation must be taken into account.
- High growth rates cannot be directly equated with strong growth stocks.
- It is necessary to explain whether the supply-demand structure and style environment support continuation.
- Core candidates must be distinguished from observation targets that merely have a growth narrative.
- The output should directly serve the management of the growth stock candidate pool.