SuperAPI AI Directory

reviewing-integrations-prior-art-survey

General & other

View repository

Updated 10-16 05:01

About this skill

Reviewing an integrations prior-art artifact

You are the second half of a two-part gate. The first half already ran.

Do not re-check what the validator refuses. Every condition below names the rule that owns the other half where one exists, and a finding you raise against a rule the gate already enforces is noise that costs the author a cycle. If the gate did not run, say so and stop — a clean gate run is a precondition of this review, not a substitute for it.

Your evidence

source what it settles
the artifact under review everything below
the vocabulary map it was produced against whether the owed grid and the angle verdicts are right
the SCOPE and CLASSIFICATION the producer was handed whether meta.classification is a faithful transcription
integrations-prior-art-survey/schemas/*.json what each field is FOR, in its description
integrations-prior-art-survey/references/source-registry.yaml caps, orderings, bands, complete_listing, the excluded block
integrations-prior-art-survey/references/angles/<angle>.md that angle's mechanism, sources and precondition
integrations-prior-art-survey/references/absent-input-policy.md the nine catalog auth modes and which of them map to null — C9
integrations-prior-art-survey/references/category-vocabulary.md the seeded category vocabulary — C13
integrations-prior-art-survey/references/integration-vocabulary-map-guide.md the probe's three checks — C20
the FROZEN extract-queue.yaml, and the extract records themselves what extraction was asked to produce, and what it wrote — C26, C28
integrations-prior-art-survey/references/extraction-template-guide.md what each record field is FOR, field by field — C21-C25
integrations-prior-art-survey/references/synthesis-lenses.md the eight formulas and the denominator each divides by — C26-C29
integrations-prior-art-survey/references/synthesis-report-guide.md the report's eight fixed sections, and what does not go in it — C30

THIRTEEN sources, and NINE of them are PRODUCER-package paths you read rather than files this package ships -- the schemas, the source registry, the angle references, the absent-input policy, the category vocabulary, the vocabulary-map guide, the extraction template guide, the synthesis lenses and the report guide. All nine. A review that reads only the artifact and the map can settle the arithmetic and none of the vocabulary. The scope and classification are on the list because meta.classification is a TRANSCRIPTION, and judged only against itself a fabricated value reads exactly like a real one.

Conditions

Read references/conditions.md. Judge every condition that applies. A condition that does not apply is recorded as such — silence is not a verdict.

Your verdict

Emit exactly one line, last:

VERDICT: approve

or

VERDICT: revise

revise requires at least one finding naming its condition. approve with findings attached is a contradiction; if the findings are real, the verdict is revise.

Do not false-revise honest work. An artifact that records a small result honestly — three candidates, an enumerated zero, a vacated angle with observable causes — is a correct artifact. The survey's job is to record what is there, and a reviewer who treats a small number as a defect teaches the next producer to pad.