One skill for all AWS services. Reasoning framework is here; service-specific facts come from MCP at runtime.
When to use
Any AWS issue where the console alone is insufficient — status checks, logs, connectivity, performance, permissions, deployments, state transitions.
Investigation workflow
Step 0 — ASK FIRST (before any diagnosis)
MUST:
- Check if critical context is missing before querying or diagnosing:
- Network issues → need VPC topology, subnet type, NAT/endpoint config
- Container/task failures → need exit code, error message, logs
- Connection timeouts → need source, destination, protocol, port
- Performance issues → need instance type, workload pattern, timeline
- If missing, ASK the user. A wrong diagnosis from assumptions wastes more time than a clarifying question.
Step 1 — Identify and collect
Determine the affected service and resource, then collect initial evidence.
MUST:
- Identify the service, resource ID, and region
- Run the service's
describe-*/get-*APIs to capture current state - Check for status checks, health checks, or equivalent (service-dependent)
- Check CloudWatch metrics for anomalies in the relevant namespace
- Read
references/stable-guardrails.mdto avoid known misdiagnosis traps
SHOULD:
- Check CloudTrail for recent API calls that may have caused the issue
- Check AWS Health Dashboard for service-level events
- Collect logs (CloudWatch Logs, system logs, console output) if available
Step 2 — Query real-time documentation
MUST:
- Use
aws-knowledgeMCPsearch_documentationto find current troubleshooting guidance for the specific symptom. Seereferences/mcp-query-patterns.md - If the search returns an SOP (
sop_namefield), retrieve it withretrieve_agent_sopfor step-by-step instructions - For ANY specific number (IOPS, limits, quotas, timeouts, cooldowns): query MCP — NEVER rely on memorized values
SHOULD:
- Cross-reference re:Post Knowledge Center articles for the error message
- Check if the service has SSM Automation runbooks (
AWSSupport-Troubleshoot*) that can automate diagnosis
MAY:
- Use
aws-knowledgerecommendtool on a relevant doc page to discover related troubleshooting content
Step 3 — Diagnose
MUST:
- Read
references/hallucination-patterns.yamlbefore concluding - State the root cause with specific evidence (API response, metric value, log excerpt)
- Classify severity: CRITICAL (service down) / HIGH (degraded) / MEDIUM (suboptimal)
SHOULD:
- Check blast radius — is only one resource affected, or is it AZ/region-wide?
- Distinguish between AWS-side issues (status checks, service events) and customer-side issues (config, permissions, application)
Step 4 — Remediate and report
MUST:
- Propose immediate mitigation with specific CLI commands
- Propose long-term prevention (alarms, auto-recovery, architecture changes)
- Output structured YAML report (see Output Format below)
SHOULD:
- Verify the fix worked (re-check status/metrics after remediation)
Output format
service: "<aws-service>"
resource: "<resource-id>"
region: "<region>"
root_cause: "<category> — <detail>"
evidence:
- type: <api_response|metric|log|event>
content: "<specific finding>"
severity: CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM
blast_radius: "<single resource | AZ | region | account>"
mitigation:
immediate: "<action with CLI command>"
long_term: "<prevention strategy>"
sources:
- "<MCP doc URL or SSM runbook name used>"
Anti-hallucination rules
- NEVER state service-specific numbers (IOPS, limits, quotas, defaults) from memory. Always query MCP first.
- Always cite evidence: API response, metric, log excerpt, or MCP doc URL.
- Read
references/hallucination-patterns.yaml— these are patterns where LLMs consistently get AWS behavior wrong. - Read
references/stable-guardrails.md— these are architectural facts that are safe to assert without querying. - Spend no more than 2 minutes on any single hypothesis. Pivot if inconclusive.
- If MCP returns no relevant results, say so explicitly. Do not fabricate guidance.
References
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
references/stable-guardrails.md |
Architectural facts that don't change — safe to assert |
references/hallucination-patterns.yaml |
Cross-service LLM mistake patterns |
references/mcp-query-patterns.md |
How to query aws-knowledge MCP effectively |
references/investigation-framework.md |
Detailed Phase 1/2/3 methodology for complex cases |