external-gitcode-ascend-ascendc-operator-doc-writer

AscendC Operator Doc Writer

Overview

Use the model itself to read a reference README and the target AscendC source files, then synthesize a matching technical document. Do not rely on Python parser scripts to infer operator semantics; use shell search and read tools only to locate files and inspect source text.

Workflow

1. Collect the template and target files

• Read exactly one reference README that represents the desired output format.
• Locate the operator implementation files by basename. In most AscendC projects this means:
  • one op_host/<op_name>.cpp
  • one op_host/<op_name>_tiling.h
  • one op_kernel/<op_name>.cpp
• If the target repo does not use a per-operator directory like the template repo, create a documentation path grouped by operator name, for example .../docs/<op_name>/README.md.
• When file ownership is ambiguous, inspect CMakeLists.txt or rg references before writing.

2. Build a source-backed understanding

• Extract confirmed facts from the host registration file:
  • operator name
  • inputs and outputs
  • dtypes and formats
  • platform gating such as ascend910b
• Extract tiling facts from the host and tiling header:
  • tiling fields
  • shape derivation
  • fixed constants
  • workspace formula
  • block and core split rules
• Extract kernel behavior from the kernel file:
  • runtime parameter parsing
  • main compute pipeline
  • mask behavior
  • reduction behavior
  • output writeback layout
• Treat anything not directly stated in code as an inference. Label it explicitly instead of presenting it as fact.

3. Write the README

• Mirror the template at the section level, but adapt the content to the target repo layout.
• Prefer a structure close to:
  • Overview
  • Inputs And Outputs
  • Runtime Parameters
  • Tiling Design
  • Kernel Design
  • File Layout Mapping
  • Build Entry
  • Limitations
  • Summary
• Keep the wording technical and source-backed.
• If the code does not provide runnable commands or a clear framework call site, say so instead of inventing one.
• If output shape or auxiliary outputs are implicit, explain that they follow the implementation contract and call out the uncertainty.

4. Verify before finishing

• Re-open the written README.
• Check every section against the source files that support it.
• Make sure the document distinguishes:
  • direct facts from code
  • reasonable inferences
  • unknowns that require upstream caller context
• Keep the final README concise enough to scan, but detailed enough that another engineer can understand how the operator is organized.

Decision Rules

If a template README exists

• Read it first and preserve its overall style.
• Reuse its section order when that order still fits the target operator.
• Rewrite the content from scratch based on the new source files; do not mechanically copy unrelated details.

If the repo layout differs from the template repo

• Normalize the doc unit around the operator name rather than the folder shape.
• Add a short File Layout Mapping section that explains where host, tiling, kernel, and doc files live in the target repo.
• Prefer creating docs under a dedicated docs/<op_name>/README.md path when there is no natural per-operator root directory.

If the user wants to use an external API

• Use the same workflow: gather the template and source files locally, then send a compact prompt plus the necessary excerpts to the API.
• Use the API as a writing engine, not as a parser replacement.
• Keep the prompt grounded in explicit file paths, extracted snippets, and required output sections.

Resources

• See references/readme-outline.md for the default section checklist.
• See references/source-review-checklist.md for what to extract from host, tiling, and kernel files.
• See references/model-prompt-template.md for a prompt skeleton that works with either the current model or a user-provided API.

Output Expectations

• Produce a README that another engineer can use without reopening all source files immediately.
• Prefer explicitly named sections over free-form prose.
• Cite uncertainty plainly when a fact is not derivable from the local code.
• Do not claim runtime behavior, call examples, or test coverage that the repo does not actually show.