Create functional, accessible, visually distinctive interfaces. Output is working code.
When to Use
Activate automatically when:
- User requests UI components, pages, or applications
- User mentions forms, dashboards, landing pages, modals
- User asks to "design", "build", or "create" any interface
- User wants to improve existing UI/UX
Workflow
Step 1: Assess Context
Before coding, identify (internal reasoning):
- Problem being solved
- Target users
- Aesthetic direction (see REFERENCES.md)
- Constraints (framework, brand, accessibility level)
Step 2: Consult References
Fetch implementation values from REFERENCES.md:
- Color palette (with WCAG-compliant values)
- Font pairing
- Component patterns (button, input, card, etc.)
- Spacing and typography tokens
Step 3: Generate Code
Produce working implementation with:
- All interactive states (hover, focus, active, disabled, loading, error)
- Semantic HTML (button, nav, main—not div soup)
- Mobile-first responsive design
- CSS variables for maintainability
Step 4: Verify
Run through checklist before delivering.
Output Requirements
| Requirement | Standard |
|---|---|
| Contrast | 4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI components |
| Focus states | Visible outline on all interactive elements |
| Touch targets | Minimum 44×44px |
| Reduced motion | Respect prefers-reduced-motion |
| Labels | All inputs have associated labels |
| Empty states | Helpful message + clear action |
| Error states | Explain what happened + how to fix |
Aesthetic Direction
Pick an extreme and commit. Indecision produces generic output. Pick a clear conceptual direction — brutally minimal, maximalist, retro-futuristic, editorial, neubrutalist, organic, luxury/refined, industrial — and execute it with precision. Bold maximalism and refined minimalism both work; the failure mode is timid middle-ground.
See REFERENCES.md for characteristics of each direction.
| Style | Best For |
|---|---|
| Minimalism | Productivity, professional, portfolios |
| Glassmorphism | Dashboards, tech products |
| Neubrutalism | Creative, startups, distinctive brands |
| Editorial | Content sites, publications |
| Organic | Consumer apps, wellness, community |
| Dark Mode | User preference, low-light contexts |
Vary across generations. Never converge on the same display font (especially Inter, Space Grotesk, Roboto) or the same purple-on-white gradient that signals AI default output.
Anti-Patterns
Avoid these markers of generic AI output:
- Purple/blue gradients on white
- Inter/Roboto/system fonts everywhere
- Cookie-cutter card layouts
- Rounded rectangles with soft shadows on everything
- Color-only meaning (no icons/text backup)
- Removed focus outlines
- Error messages without solutions
Checklist
Copy and track:
- [ ] Context assessed (problem, users, aesthetic direction)
- [ ] REFERENCES.md consulted for palette + fonts
- [ ] All interactive states implemented
- [ ] Loading and error states included
- [ ] Contrast meets WCAG AA
- [ ] Semantic HTML used
- [ ] Focus states visible
- [ ] Form inputs labeled
- [ ] prefers-reduced-motion respected
- [ ] Responsive breakpoints tested
- [ ] Empty states handled
Recovery
| Issue | Action |
|---|---|
| User dislikes direction | Propose 2-3 alternatives from Aesthetic Directions |
| Looks too generic | Check Anti-Patterns, apply distinctive typography |
| Accessibility concerns | Verify contrast, focus states, semantic HTML |
| States incomplete | Walk through checklist systematically |
License: MIT - See LICENSE for complete terms Author: Arvind Menon