SuperAPI AI Directory
Partner with us中文AI newsFavorites
Skillsmuse-delegate

muse-delegate

Coding & development

View repository

Updated 10-16 05:00

About this skill

Muse Delegate

You are the orchestrator. This skill lets you hand a bounded coding task to a separate implementer — Muse Code (muse) — then review what it produced and land it yourself. You write the brief and own the judgment; Muse does the typing in its own exec run; you verify and commit.

Nothing here is specific to one orchestrating agent. The loop needs only the ability to run a shell command and read a file, so any agent with those two capabilities can drive it. The full delegate → review → commit loop has been run with Claude Code as the orchestrator. Other orchestrators remain unproven.

When NOT to use this

  • The task is small enough to just do inline — delegation overhead is not worth it.
  • The muse CLI is not installed or not authenticated (run muse login, or set META_API_KEY).
  • You want to write the code yourself.
  • You are on native Windows and need a supported launcher. Upstream's muse launcher is Darwin/Linux only; this skill still ships in the Windows contract matrix, but a live Windows dispatch is not a supported Muse install.

Read this before the first dispatch: the autonomy model

Headless Muse is muse exec only. muse resume is the interactive TUI and is never invoked. --resume-last is rejected; continue a run with --session <id> (Muse's --session-id).

Write runs keep Muse's sandbox on and pass --disable-approval so a headless run cannot hang on a tool-approval prompt. They also pass --trust-workspace and --user-input-auto-resolve. That is not --yolo and not --full-access — do not invent either as the default. --trust-workspace loads the target repo's rules and skills into the implementer run, and nothing in the relay narrows the implementer's tool set inside the sandbox; the brief is what bounds it to the task.

--read-only adds --disable-write (non-shell filesystem writes) and --disable-shell. Approval stays disabled so the review cannot block on a prompt either.

--provider echo|meta is a relay-only flag for tests and explicit probes. It is not a fleet dial.

Prerequisites (check once)

  1. muse --version succeeds. If not, install Muse Code and run muse login (or export META_API_KEY).
  2. Confirm which muse is on PATH. command -v muse shows the active launcher. The relay records the version it ran into result.json.
  3. You are in (or will point --cd at) the target git repository.

Choose the implementer model

Muse has a configured default model, so a fresh run may omit --model. Pass --model or a fleet --lane that sets one when you need to pin a catalog id. On a resumed --session run, omit --model to keep the session's model. If the human has not named a usable set, ask before guessing a metered id.

More depth: references/writing-the-brief.md.

The loop

Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 are your judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical.

1. Write the brief

Muse sees only the text you send plus what it can read from the working tree — no chat history, no shared context. Everything the task needs goes in the brief: the goal, the current state, what to change, what to leave untouched, the project's actual gate commands (discover them from the repo's AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md/Makefile — do not assume), and a report contract. Tell Muse it will not commit (you will). Keep one task per brief. Full guidance and a template: references/writing-the-brief.md.

2. Dispatch

Send the brief to Muse with the bundled helper. It wraps muse exec --json --prompt-file, captures the run, and writes a structured result.json. (<skill-dir> below is this skill's installed directory — the folder containing this SKILL.md.)

node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo
# optional model:                           add --model <id>
# fleet lane from delegate-setup:           add --lane <name>  (dials apply; flags still win)
# reasoning intensity:                      add --effort none|minimal|low|medium|high|xhigh|max|ultra
# read-only (no non-shell writes, no shell): add --read-only
# continue a specific Muse session:         add --session <id>  (delta brief only; no --resume-last)
# hard time limit (watchdog):               add --timeout 2h  (default: off; implementation runs routinely need 1-2h)
# see all options:                          node .../relay.mjs --help

The helper writes artifacts to a temp dir, so the repo under review stays clean. It never commits — see step 5. Mechanics, flags, and the result.json shape: references/dispatch-and-poll.md.

3. Wait for completion

The helper blocks until Muse finishes, so back it with whatever your orchestrator offers and resume when it returns:

  • Claude Code: run the Bash call with run_in_background: true; you are notified on completion.
  • Plain shell / other agents: run it in the foreground for short tasks, or background it and poll the result file. The run is done when result.json exists with a status. (A pre-run usage error — bad args or an empty brief — instead exits with code 2 and writes no result file, so check the exit code too. A missing muse binary exits 127 but does write a result.json with status muse_unavailable. --resume-last is a usage error: headless resume is --session <id>.)

Do not trust progress trackers over reality: a run is finished when result.json is written and the process has exited. Muse can exit 0 without a run.terminal.completed event; the relay reports that as failed, not completed. The implementer's full report is the finalMessage field in result.json (also printed in full on stdout between the report markers).

4. Review — do not trust the self-report

Muse's result.json includes its own final message and any gate claims. Re-verify, don't accept:

  • Re-run the project's gates yourself (the test/lint/build commands from step 1). Never take "gates passed" on faith.
  • Read the diff against the brief: did Muse do what was asked, nothing more (scope creep) and nothing less? touchedFiles in the result is your starting point.
  • Run the relevant guard skills on the diff if you have them installed (clean-code-guard, test-guard, etc. from guard-skills) — this skill produces the work; those skills judge it.
  • For schema/migration changes, round-trip them; for removals, grep for dangling references.

Full checklist: references/review-and-land.md.

5. Land it

The implementer edits the working tree; the orchestrator commits. Committing should be the act of the party that verified the work. Only after the gates pass and the diff holds:

  • Commit the verified work yourself, with a clear message.
  • If it needs changes, send a delta brief with --session <id> (don't restate the whole task) and review again. There is no headless --resume-last.

Authorization model

Delegation is something the human opts into. Once they have ("run this queue", "proceed"), committing verified, gate-passing work is the agreed contract — that is the whole point. Two limits on that mandate: surface, don't absorb (report Muse's design decisions, defensible-but-unasked turns, and non-blocking nitpicks rather than silently keeping them) and stop for scope changes (if correct completion needs going beyond the brief, ask — don't expand the mandate yourself). The full treatment is in references/review-and-land.md.

References