Target Role
- Role: Corporate Account Manager, Credit Approval Officer, Industry Researcher, Risk Manager
- Use Cases: Pre-loan industry access assessment, annual adjustment of credit policy, industry background analysis for specific customers, analysis of causes of non-performing loans, emerging industry access research
- Output Purpose: Generate a structured in-depth industry analysis report to provide professional research support for credit decisions and industry understanding
- Decision Level: Core reference material for credit approval, risk level medium, must be reviewed by a credit approval officer
- Execution Frequency: Executed once before each credit application, and once during annual adjustment of credit policy
Data Sources
Required Data
| Data Item | Source | Acquisition Method | Sensitivity Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry statistical data | National Bureau of Statistics/Industry Association | API/File Read | Public |
| Financial data of listed companies | Wind/Tonghuashun/Annual Reports | API/File Read | Public |
| Industrial policy documents | NDRC/MIIT/Ministry of Finance | File Read | Public |
| Capacity utilization data | MIIT/Industry Association | API/File Read | Public/Internal |
| Historical industry analysis reports | Internal knowledge base | File Read | Internal |
Data Masking Rules
- Undisclosed internal corporate financial data: used only in internal reports, must not be disclosed externally
- Customer trade secret information (such as core technical parameters): use "a certain technology" in external reports instead
- Sensitive policy documents (undisclosed): only noted in internal records, not disclosed externally
- Third-party commercial data: indicate the source institution, must not be disseminated without authorization
- Industry concentration data: use interval values (such as "CR5=40%-50%") rather than precise values
Degradation Strategy
- If Wind/Tonghuashun data is unavailable: mark "industry financial data not included", continue analysis based on public data
- If industry association data is unavailable: mark "industry statistical data missing", use National Bureau of Statistics data instead
- If historical industry reports are unavailable: mark "no historical comparison data", conduct only current period analysis
- If capacity utilization data is unavailable: mark "capacity data not verified", estimate based on enterprise survey data
- If policy documents cover only 1 year: mark "insufficient historical policy data", conduct only current period policy analysis
Constraints
Regulatory basis: CBRC's "Guidelines for Due Diligence in Commercial Bank Credit Granting", the People's Bank of China's "General Rules for Loans", the National Bureau of Statistics' "Industrial Classification for National Economic Activities" (GB/T 4754-2017), the NDRC's "Guidance Catalogue for Industrial Structure Adjustment" (current version), the MIIT's "Early Warning Mechanism for Overcapacity in Key Industries and Fields"
- Clarification of industry boundaries: Before analysis, the industry scope must be clearly defined (according to the four-digit codes in GB/T 4754-2017) to avoid conflating adjacent tracks in the analysis
- Data timeliness requirements: Quantitative data must indicate the source and cutoff date; data older than 2 years must be marked as "historical reference" with a note that it may no longer be valid
- Separation of opinions and facts: Objective facts (supported by sourced data) and analyst inferences (based on logical reasoning) must be distinguished with different wording (use "expected/judged/estimated" for inferences)
- Priority to quantitative conclusions: All directional judgments (such as "intense competition/favorable market outlook") must be accompanied by specific quantitative indicators (such as "CR5=47%, HHI=980"); purely qualitative statements are prohibited
- Balanced presentation of risks: For controversial industry trends, both optimistic and pessimistic bases must be presented simultaneously to avoid misleading credit decisions with a single perspective
- Data source grading: Primary sources (National Bureau of Statistics/PBOC/listed company announcements) > secondary sources (industry associations) > tertiary sources (commercial research reports); tertiary sources must indicate the institution and release date
- Differentiation in scenario analysis: The core assumptions of the optimistic/neutral/pessimistic scenarios must differ substantially (growth rate ranges must differ by at least 5 percentage points); pseudo-scenario analysis is prohibited
- Skipping steps prohibited: No analysis step may be skipped, even if the intermediate results "look normal". All numbers must show the calculation process.
- Mandatory enforcement of red lines: If any of the 6 industry red lines (I1-I6) is triggered, it must be prominently marked at the beginning of the report and must not be hidden in the body text.
Financial compliance red lines
I1: Eliminated industries - The industry belongs to the eliminated category in the "Guidance Catalogue for Industrial Structure Adjustment" or is explicitly subject to restrictions on adding new capacity; credit granting must be suspended
I2: Severe overcapacity - The industry's capacity utilization rate is < 60% and has been continuously declining for 2 consecutive years; credit granting must be suspended
I3: Collective industry losses - Leading enterprises in the industry have collectively suffered losses in the past 3 years, and there is no clear policy support for capacity reduction; high risk must be marked
I4: Technology disruption risk - The industry faces major technology substitution risk, and the mainstream technology route is expected to be disrupted within 5 years; high risk must be marked
I5: Tightening of regulatory policies - The industry faces systemic tightening of regulatory policies, and the corresponding enterprises' compliance transformation costs exceed the profit center; credit granting must be suspended
I6: Subsidy phase-out risk - The industry's downstream is highly dependent on a single policy driver (subsidies), and clear signals of subsidy phase-out have emerged; high risk must be marked
Credit scenario-specific focus points
This skill covers both investment research analysis and bank credit scenarios. When used for pre-loan industry access assessment, credit policy formulation, or industry risk screening, the following dimensions must be prioritized in the output:
| Dimension | Key credit concerns | Typical risk signals |
|---|---|---|
| Industry access compliance | Whether it belongs to a restricted/eliminated industry, and whether it triggers a one-vote veto for environmental protection or work safety | Listed in the NDRC's Catalogue for Guiding Industry Restructuring as a restricted or eliminated category |
| Position in the capacity cycle | Whether it is currently in an expansion phase or an overcapacity clearing phase, affecting the sustainability of corporate cash flow | Industry capacity utilization rate < 70%; capacity under construction / existing capacity > 30% |
| Policy sensitivity | Whether the industry relies on policy subsidies, and quantification of the impact of policy phase-out risk on profits | Subsidies account for > 30% of total profit; policy window ≤ 1 year |
| Stability of the competitive landscape | Direction of change in industry concentration, and whether leading players suppressing prices or chaotic competition erodes the profits of SMEs | CR5 < 20% and continuously declining; price war lasting more than 2 years |
| Amplitude of cyclical fluctuations | The transmission intensity of industry prosperity fluctuations to corporate revenue/profit, affecting the stability of repayment sources | Revenue decline at historical cyclical trough > 30%; price elasticity coefficient > 2 |
| Downstream concentration risk | Whether the concentration of major end customers is too high, and whether dependence on a single customer forms a credit contagion chain | The top three customers accounting for > 50% of revenue is a common industry phenomenon |
Execution Workflow
Step 0: Data Confirmation and Validation
List input parameters: industry name, GB/T 4754-2017 industry code, geographic scope, analysis purpose.
Confirm the data time range and the validity period of policy documents.
Run scripts/validate_industry.py to check the completeness of input parameters.
- ✅ Validation passed → proceed to Step 1
- ❌ Validation failed → return the missing list and ask the user to supplement it
📋 Data source:
user_upload(industry information provided by the user)
Step 1: Clarify the analysis scope and select the framework
Confirm the following information:
- Target industry and sub-sectors (clarify industry boundaries, defined by the four-digit codes of GB/T 4754-2017)
- Geographic scope of the analysis (China/global/specific region)
- Time dimension of the analysis (current status or future forecast)
- Purpose of the analysis (pre-loan industry access/credit policy formulation/industry risk screening)
Select a combination of analysis frameworks according to industry characteristics:
- Traditional manufacturing → focus on industry chain analysis + cost curve + capacity cycle
- Technology industry → focus on technology maturity curve + penetration S-curve + innovation diffusion model
- Consumer industry → focus on consumer profiling + channel analysis + brand strength assessment
- Cyclical industry → focus on supply-demand analysis + inventory cycle + price elasticity
Consult references/industry-analysis-guide.md to obtain the industry analysis framework selection guide.
- ✅ Framework selection completed → proceed to Step 2
- ❌ Industry boundary too broad (e.g., "manufacturing") → prompt the user to refine it to the middle or small category
📋 Data source:
user_upload(provided by the user)
Step 2: Industry overview and quantitative characterization
Market size estimation(specific figures and calculation logic must be provided)
- Top-down: TAM (total addressable market) → SAM (serviceable available market) → SOM (serviceable obtainable market)
- Bottom-up: end demand × unit price = market space
- Cross-validation: supply-side capacity vs demand-side consumption
Precise Positioning of Industry Life Cycle
- Introduction phase characteristics: penetration rate <5%, technology route undetermined, losses widespread
- Growth phase characteristics: penetration rate 5%-30%, growth rate >20%, leaders begin to emerge
- Maturity phase characteristics: penetration rate >50%, growth rate <10%, concentration increases
- Decline phase characteristics: negative growth, capacity consolidation, substitutes emerge
Tracking of Key Industry Indicators
- Identify 3-5 core leading indicators for the industry
- Analyze the current state and direction of change of these indicators
- Determine the industry's position in the prosperity cycle
Do not skip any calculation steps; all numbers must show the calculation process.
- ✅ Data complete → proceed to Step 3
- ⚠️ Partial data missing → mark "data missing", continue based on available data
📋 Data source:
reference(National Bureau of Statistics/Industry Association)
Step 3: In-Depth Value Chain Breakdown
Sort out the complete industry chain structure, focusing on value distribution:
上游(原材料/核心零部件)— 毛利率?壁垒?集中度?
↓ [成本传导机制]
中游(制造/加工/集成)— 毛利率?壁垒?集中度?
↓ [渠道/定价模式]
下游(渠道/终端应用/消费者)— 毛利率?壁垒?集中度?
Value Chain Profit Pool Analysis
- Comparison of gross margin levels across segments
- Which segment are profits concentrated in? Why?
- How will profits migrate in the future?
Key Bottlenecks and Chokepoint Segments
- Segments with the highest technical barriers
- Segments with the tightest supply
- Progress and timetable for domestic substitution
Upstream-Downstream Bargaining Relationship
-
Analysis of bargaining power ownership (concentration, switching costs, degree of differentiation)
-
Cost pass-through capability (can price increases be passed downstream? How long is the time lag?)
-
✅ Industry chain structure clear → proceed to Step 4
-
⚠️ Insufficient data for some segments → mark "unverified", estimate based on research data
📋 Data source:
reference(Listed company annual reports/prospectuses)
Step 4: In-Depth Competitive Landscape Analysis
Porter's Five Forces Quantitative Assessment(Score each item 1-5 and explain the reasons)
| Competitive Force | Intensity Score | Key Driving Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Existing Competitors | /5 | |
| Potential Entrants | /5 | |
| Threat of Substitutes | /5 | |
| Supplier Bargaining Power | /5 | |
| Buyer Bargaining Power | /5 |
Evolution of Market Concentration
- Trend of CR3/CR5/CR10 changes over the past 5 years
- HHI index and its implications
- Drivers of increasing/decreasing concentration
Analysis of Competition Factors
- What are the core dimensions of competition in this industry? (cost/technology/brand/channel/scale/speed)
- Differences in competitive strategies among players in different tiers
- Is there a "winner-takes-all" or "differentiated coexistence" pattern
In-Depth Benchmarking of Major Players
- Differences in strategic positioning
- Comparison of core competitiveness (technology, cost, brand, channel, customers)
- Comparison of financial indicators (revenue, profit margin, ROE, R&D investment)
- Potential M&A integration opportunities
CR3/CR5 and HHI quantitative indicators must be provided; if data is unavailable, the reason must be explained and an estimated range must be given.
- ✅ Competitive landscape quantification complete → proceed to Step 5
- ⚠️ Insufficient concentration data → mark "data missing", provide estimated range
📋 Data sources:
reference(Wind/Tonghuashun/listed company announcements)
Step 5: PEST Macro Environment Analysis
Political (policy environment)
- Industrial policy direction (encouraged/restricted/neutral)
- Specific policy documents and quantified impact
- Judgment of regulatory trends
- Geopolitical impact (if applicable)
Economic (economic environment)
- Correlation with the macroeconomic cycle (β value)
- Interest rate/exchange rate sensitivity
- Impact of changes in household income and consumption structure
Social (social environment)
- Impact of demographic structure changes
- Changes in consumption habits/lifestyle
- Impact of social trends such as ESG/carbon neutrality
Technological (technological environment)
-
Key technology routes and maturity
-
Pace of technological iteration and risk of generational shifts
-
Possibility of disruptive technologies emerging
-
✅ PEST analysis completed → proceed to Step 6
-
⚠️ Policy documents cover only 1 year → mark "insufficient historical policy data" and conduct only current-period analysis
📋 Data sources:
reference(NDRC/MIIT/MOF policy documents)
Step 6: Supply-Demand Analysis and Prosperity Judgment
Supply-side analysis
- Existing production capacity and utilization rate
- Under-construction/planned production capacity and commissioning timetable
- Capital expenditure cycle of capacity expansion
- Supply elasticity (difficulty and time required for capacity expansion)
Demand-side analysis
- Breakdown of end demand drivers
- Assessment of the sustainability of demand growth
- Demand elasticity (price sensitivity)
- Potential demand substitution risk
Supply-demand balance table projection
-
Calculation of supply-demand gap for the next 2-3 years
-
Price trend judgment
-
Direction of change in the industry's profit center
-
✅ Supply-demand analysis completed → proceed to Step 7
-
⚠️ Capacity data not verified → mark "capacity data not verified" and estimate based on company survey data
📋 Data sources:
reference(MIIT/industry association capacity data)
Step 7: Drivers and Risk Matrix
Growth drivers(sorted by impact)
- Quantify the incremental space contributed by each driver
- Assess the certainty and sustainability of each factor
- Distinguish short-term catalysts from long-term drivers
Risk matrix(assessed by probability × impact)
| Risk type | Probability of occurrence | Degree of impact | Response strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| High/Medium/Low | High/Medium/Low |
- ✅ Risk matrix completed → proceed to Step 8
📋 Data sources:
context(analysis results of Steps 1-6)
Step 8: Development Trend Forecast and Red Line Verification
Short-term trend (1-2 years)
- Linear extrapolation based on existing data
- Impact of policies/products/capacity about to be implemented
- Short-term catalysts/risk events
Medium-term trend (3-5 years)
- Unfolding Path of Structural Changes
- Penetration Rate Growth Curve
- Endgame Projection of the Competitive Landscape
Long-Term Trends (5-10 Years)
- Possibility of Technological Paradigm Shift
- Directions of Business Model Innovation
- Envisioning the Industry's Ultimate Form
Scenario Analysis
- Optimistic Scenario: Assumptions + Corresponding Market Size + Growth Rate
- Neutral Scenario: Assumptions + Corresponding Market Size + Growth Rate
- Pessimistic Scenario: Assumptions + Corresponding Market Size + Growth Rate
The growth rate ranges of the three scenarios must differ by at least 5pct, the core assumptions must have substantive differences, and pseudo-scenario analysis is prohibited.
Red Line Verification
-
Check the 6 industry red lines (I1-I6) item by item, consult
references/industry-analysis-guide.mdto obtain the red line judgment criteria -
If any red line is triggered, it must be prominently marked at the beginning of the report
-
✅ Red line verification completed → Generate the final report
-
⚠️ Red line triggered → Mark it in a separate section at the beginning of the report and proceed to Step 9
📋 Data sources:
context(analysis results of Steps 1-7) 📋 Confirmation mechanism:inform(notify the credit approval officer for confirmation after generation)
Step 9: Output the Final Report
Use assets/industry-analysis-template.md template to generate a structured report.
Annotate all data: data source + data date + whether it is the latest data.
Append a disclaimer at the end of the report, citing shared/disclaimer-template.md。
- ✅ Report generation completed → End
- ❌ Report format validation failed → Return to Step 8 for correction
📋 Executing entity:
ai📋 Confirmation mechanism:inform(notify the user that the report has been generated)
Output Format
Use assets/industry-analysis-template.md template.
The report must include the following sections:
- Industry Overview (industry definition and classification, life cycle positioning, market size and growth rate, core tracking indicators)
- Industry Chain Analysis (industry chain panorama, value chain profit pool distribution, upstream and downstream analysis, key bottlenecks and domestic substitution)
- Competitive Landscape (market concentration and evolution trends, competitive factors and core barriers, in-depth benchmarking of major enterprises, quantitative assessment of Porter's Five Forces)
- Macro Environment (PEST: Policy/Economic/Social/Technological)
- Supply and Demand Analysis (supply-side status and outlook, decomposition of demand-side drivers, supply-demand balance sheet and price trends)
- Drivers and Risks (growth drivers, risk matrix, sensitivity analysis)
- Development Trends and Outlook (short-term/medium-term/long-term trends, three scenario analyses)
- Conclusions and Recommendations (industry rating, sub-sectors recommended for attention, key assumptions and risk warnings)
Annotate all data: data source + data date + whether it is the latest data.
Disclaimer: The end of the report must cite the shared/disclaimer-template.md template to ensure it includes necessary statements such as "does not constitute investment advice".
Downstream Compatibility: This output can be parsed and used by the credit-due-diligence and submit-credit-application Skills. Key output fields (industry rating, red line trigger status, capacity utilization rate) must use a structured table format; it is prohibited to place them only in natural language paragraphs.
Audit Trail
After each industry analysis is completed, generate an audit log audit/{行业简称}_{日期}_audit.json:
{
"skill_name": "credit-industry-analysis",
"skill_version": "2.0.0",
"execution_time": "2026-05-05T10:30:00+08:00",
"input_params": {
"industry_name": "XX行业",
"gb_code": "C3985(电子元件及组件制造)",
"geo_scope": "中国",
"analysis_purpose": "贷前行业准入评估"
},
"operator": "客户经理姓名(工号:XXX)",
"steps": [
{
"step": "数据确认与验证",
"executor": "ai",
"data_source": {"type": "user_upload"},
"result": "pass"
},
{
"step": "明确分析范围与框架选择",
"executor": "ai",
"data_source": {"type": "user_upload"},
"result": "pass"
},
{
"step": "发展趋势预判与红线核查",
"executor": "ai",
"data_source": {"type": "context"},
"red_lines_triggered": ["I2:严重产能过剩"],
"confirmation": {"type": "inform", "notified_to": "信贷审批官", "notified_at": "2026-05-05T10:55:00+08:00"},
"result": "pass"
}
],
"red_lines_triggered": ["I2"],
"warnings": ["部分数据超过2年,已标注历史参考"],
"references_used": ["references/industry-analysis-guide.md"]
}
Audit log retention period: At least 3 years.
Gotchas
#1: Industry boundary too broad
- Symptom: Analyzing "manufacturing" or "wholesale and retail trade" without specificity
- Cause: Failure to refine the GB/T 4754-2017 classification to the medium or small class
- Solution: Always look up the client's exact industry code, and refer to
references/industry-analysis-guide.mdto obtain the sub-industry characteristics
#2: Market size estimation logic not transparent
- Symptom: Only citing third-party research report figures without explaining the estimation basis and assumptions
- Cause: Failure to strictly implement TAM/SAM/SOM or dual-sided supply-demand estimation
- Solution: Formulas and assumptions must be listed; citing third-party figures without explaining the basis is prohibited
#3: Red-line signals buried in the main text
- Symptom: Industry capacity utilization rate < 60%, but the red-line warning was not placed at the beginning of the report
- Cause: Content was not prioritized when generating the report
- Solution: After the red-line check is completed, if any trigger occurs, it must be marked in a separate section at the beginning of the report
#4: No differentiation in scenario analysis
- Symptom: The growth rate assumptions for the optimistic/neutral/pessimistic scenarios differ by only 1-2pct
- Cause: No core assumptions with substantive differences were set
- Solution: The growth rate ranges of the three scenarios must differ by at least 5pct, and the core assumptions must have substantive differences
#5: Competitive landscape not quantified
- Symptom: Only describing "intense competition" without providing quantitative indicators such as CR5 and HHI
- Cause: Failure to strictly implement the quantitative requirements for the competitive landscape
- Solution: CR3/CR5 and HHI are mandatory indicators; when data is unavailable, the reason must be explained and an estimated range provided
Examples
Example 1: Pre-loan industry access assessment (normal case)
User input:
请为光伏组件制造行业生成行业深度分析报告,用于贷前行业准入评估。地理范围:中国。分析目的:判断是否纳入授信准入行业。
Skill execution process:
- Clarify industry boundary → GB/T 4754-2017: C3825 (Manufacture of solar photovoltaic cells and modules)
- Industry overview → Market size, life cycle positioning (growth stage), tracking of core indicators
- Industry chain analysis → Upstream silicon materials, midstream solar cells, downstream power stations
- Competitive landscape → CR5=52%, HHI=1150, concentration increasing
- Supply-demand analysis → Capacity utilization rate 75%, capacity under construction / existing capacity = 25%
- Red-line check → I1-I6 not triggered
Output points:
- Industry rating: Recommended for access
- Core logic: The industry is in the growth stage, concentration is increasing, and capacity utilization is healthy
- Risk warning: Pay attention to technology iteration risk (N-type cells replacing P-type)
Example 2: Industry risk warning (red-line trigger case)
User input:
请分析钢铁行业当前状况,用于授信政策年度调整。重点关注产能过剩情况。
Skill execution process:
- Clarify industry boundary → GB/T 4754-2017: C3120 (Steelmaking)
- Industry overview → Market size, life cycle positioning (mature stage), capacity utilization rate 58%
- Supply-demand analysis → Capacity under construction / existing capacity = 35%, supply-demand gap widening
- Red-line check → I2 triggered (capacity utilization rate < 60% and declining for 2 consecutive years)
Output Points:
- ⚠️ Red-line Warning: Triggered I2 (Severe Overcapacity)
- Industry Rating: Restricted Access
- Core Logic: Capacity utilization continues to decline, capacity under construction remains high, supply-demand imbalance
- Recommendation: Suspend new credit granting, gradually reduce existing customer exposure
Out of Scope
- This Skill does not handle enterprise financial data analysis (please use the financial-report-analysis Skill)
- This Skill does not handle equity penetration analysis (please use the equity-penetration-analysis Skill)
- This Skill does not generate product marketing plans (please use the product-roadshow Skill)
- This Skill does not handle personal credit industry consulting
- This Skill does not directly modify customer data or submit credit applications
- If the user requests the above content, clearly inform them and recommend the appropriate Skill or contact the corresponding department