SuperAPI AI Directory

devdocs-compound

Office & productivity

View repository

Updated 10-15 08:12

About this skill

Knowledge Compound Precipitation

After the development cycle is complete, extract the patterns, pitfalls, and key decisions from this development effort, and precipitate them into reusable structured knowledge.

Language Rules

  • Support questions in Chinese and English
  • Unified Chinese replies
  • Generate documents in Chinese

Positioning

devdocs-sync:同步文档状态、追溯矩阵          → 文档层面的完成
devdocs-compound:提取经验、沉淀模式          → 知识层面的复利

Complementary Relationship: devdocs-sync ensures "this time it was done right," while this Skill ensures "next time it can also be done right."

Trigger Conditions

  • After devdocs-sync is complete (recommended)
  • After a round of development iteration ends
  • The user proactively requests extraction of lessons learned
  • A pattern or pitfall worth recording is discovered

Run Mode

/devdocs-compound                    → 完整流程(提取 + 写入 + 更新)
/devdocs-compound --extract-only     → 仅提取,不写入文件(预览模式)
/devdocs-compound --check            → 系统学习检查(仅评估是否有未沉淀的经验)

Workflow

1. 回顾本次开发
   ├── 读取 verify-report.md(若存在)
   ├── 读取 04-dev-tasks*.md 了解完成的任务
   ├── 读取 git log 了解提交历史
   └── 回顾对话中的关键决策点
   │
   ▼
2. 提取候选模式
   ├── 有效的解决方案(正面模式)
   ├── 踩过的坑和修复方式(陷阱)
   ├── 关键技术决策及其理由(决策记录)
   └── 可复用的代码模式或架构模式
   │
   ▼
3. 去重检查
   ├── 扫描 docs/devdocs/patterns/ 已有模式
   └── 跳过已存在的相似模式,或标记为"更新"
   │
   ▼
4. 与用户确认
   ├── 展示提取的候选模式列表
   └── 用户选择:写入 / 跳过 / 修改
   │
   ▼
5. 写入模式文档
   ├── 新模式 → 创建 docs/devdocs/patterns/<pattern-name>.md
   └── 已有模式更新 → 编辑现有文件
   │
   ▼
6. 建议运行 `/agent-memory` 更新 AGENTS.md(可选)
   ├── 项目特定知识更新
   └── 仅当模式具有项目级影响时
   │
   ▼
7. 系统学习检查
   ├── 本次遇到的问题是否已沉淀为规则/模板/检查器?
   ├── 若没有,原因是什么?
   └── 输出检查结论

Pattern Extraction Guide

What Is Worth Extracting

Type Signal Example
Positive Pattern Solved a recurring problem "Use the Strategy pattern to decouple payment channels"
Pitfall Was fixed after hitting the pitfall, and may be encountered again "SQLite requires WAL mode for concurrent writes"
Decision Has clear trade-offs, and the rationale is not obvious "Choose SSR over SPA because of SEO requirements"
Workflow A more efficient development process was discovered "Writing integration tests first and then splitting them into unit tests is more efficient"

What Is Not Worth Extracting

  • Project-specific and non-reusable details
  • Obvious best practices (such as "write tests")
  • Temporary workarounds (unless marked as temporary)
  • Rules already covered in AGENTS.md or SKILL.md

Pattern Document Structure

Each pattern document follows a unified structure, see templates/pattern.md。

File Naming:docs/devdocs/patterns/<kebab-case-pattern-name>.md

Systematic Learning Check

Each time /devdocs-compound is executed, the following check questions must be answered:

Checklist

  1. Rule Check: Has the problem encountered this time already been precipitated as a rule (constraint/check item)?

    • If yes → record in which SKILL.md or AGENTS.md
    • If no → should it be precipitated? Reason?
  2. Template Check: Should the solution from this time be updated into a template?

    • If yes → mark the target template file
    • If no → reason?
  3. Checker Check: Can the verification logic from this time be automated into a check step?

    • If yes → mark the constraints section of the target Skill
    • If no → reason?

Check Output Format

## 系统学习检查

| 维度 | 已沉淀? | 目标位置 | 备注 |
|------|---------|----------|------|
| 规则 | ✅/❌ | <文件路径> | <说明> |
| 模板 | ✅/❌ | <文件路径> | <说明> |
| 检查器 | ✅/❌ | <文件路径> | <说明> |

**未沉淀原因**:<若有未沉淀项,说明原因>

Output Files

  • Pattern document:docs/devdocs/patterns/<pattern-name>.md
  • Systematic learning check conclusion: output to the conversation (do not generate a separate file)

Constraints

Extraction Constraints

  • Must review verify-report and task documents
  • Must confirm with the user before writing(--extract-only preview only)
  • Must check existing patterns to avoid duplication
  • pattern documents follow the template structure
  • file names use kebab-case

Quality Constraints

  • The pattern must include "Problem Background" and "Solution Approach"(both are required)
  • Must include "Applicable Conditions" and "Prohibited Conditions"(to prevent misuse)
  • The pattern description is specific and actionable, avoiding vague generalities
  • Associated Skill/template fields help the Agent discover and reuse it

Systematic Learning Constraints

  • A systematic learning check must be completed on every execution
  • The check conclusion must address three dimensions (rules/templates/checkers)
  • Any item not captured must have its reason explained

Security Constraints

  • Do not modify code files
  • Do not modify existing DevDocs documents(only create/update patterns/)
  • Do not directly modify AGENTS.md; when an update is needed, suggest the user run /agent-memory

Skill Collaboration

Scenario Collaborating Skill Description
Prerequisite /devdocs-sync Execute compound after sync is complete
Prerequisite /devdocs-verify Read the verification report to extract improvement patterns
Prerequisite /devdocs-dev-workflow Recommended for execution at the end of the workflow (default in batch mode)
Knowledge Update /agent-memory Can be used together during large-scale knowledge updates

Sub-Agent Summary Format

When this Skill runs as a sub-Agent, return the following structured summary:

skill: devdocs-compound
patterns_extracted: 2
patterns_updated: 1
patterns_skipped: 0  # 已存在的相似模式
system_learning:
  rules_gap: false
  template_gap: true
  checker_gap: false
status: completed
output_files:
  - docs/devdocs/patterns/strategy-payment-channels.md
  - docs/devdocs/patterns/sqlite-wal-concurrency.md

Next Steps

Result Suggested Next Step
New patterns extracted Refer to them in the next related development docs/devdocs/patterns/
Rule gap found Update the constraints section of the corresponding SKILL.md
Template gap found Update the corresponding templates/ file
No new knowledge Normal, not every iteration has new patterns