SuperAPI AI Directory

research-slide-deck-builder

Writing & research

View repository

Updated 10-15 09:45

About this skill

Research Slide Deck Builder

Purpose

Help the user turn research content into a clear, reusable slide deck. This skill owns the deck design problem: slide order, title page, visual style, page-level layout, figure placement, section logic, and what belongs on each slide.

Use presentation-dry-run later when the user already has slides and wants to rehearse timing, spoken transitions, and Q&A.

When to Use

  • User needs to make PPT/keynote/slides for an advisor meeting, lab meeting, group update, paper reading report, conference talk, proposal, or defense segment
  • User asks what the deck should look like, what title page to use, how many slides to make, or how to structure each page
  • User has research notes/results but no slide structure yet
  • User wants a reusable style convention so they do not redesign every deck from scratch

Deck Design Principles

  • One slide, one job. Every slide needs a sentence-level takeaway.
  • Make the audience's path explicit: context -> question -> evidence -> decision.
  • For advisor updates, prioritize decision points and blockers over polished storytelling.
  • For research talks, prioritize motivation, problem framing, and result interpretation.
  • Figures are evidence, not decoration. Explain axes, setup, and takeaway.
  • Use restrained academic styling: clean white/light background, dark text, one accent color, generous margins, no visual clutter.

Workflow

Stage 1: Identify Presentation Type

Ask:

  • Who is the audience: advisor, lab, committee, conference, interview, or classmates?
  • How long is the talk?
  • Is the goal to get feedback, report progress, teach a paper, persuade, or defend a claim?
  • What is the single most important takeaway?
  • What material exists already: notes, figures, tables, code results, paper PDF, outline?

Stage 2: Choose the Deck Archetype

Use the closest archetype:

Advisor update deck (5-10 slides)

  1. Title / meeting goal
  2. Last meeting commitments
  3. One-slide progress summary
  4. Key result or evidence
  5. What is solved
  6. What is stuck
  7. Options / decision needed
  8. Next-week plan

Lab meeting research update (8-15 slides)

  1. Title
  2. Problem and motivation
  3. Current research question
  4. Method or setup
  5. Experimental setup
  6. Main result
  7. Ablation / analysis
  8. Limitation or failure case
  9. Next steps and questions

Paper reading report (8-12 slides)

  1. Title: paper + why it matters
  2. One-sentence contribution
  3. Problem setting
  4. Method overview
  5. Key technical idea
  6. Main experiments
  7. Strengths
  8. Weaknesses / assumptions
  9. Relevance to my project
  10. Discussion questions

Conference-style talk (10-20 slides)

  1. Title
  2. Motivation
  3. Problem
  4. Gap in prior work
  5. Method intuition
  6. Method details
  7. Experimental setup
  8. Main result
  9. Analysis / ablation
  10. Limitations
  11. Takeaway

Stage 3: Apply the Reusable Visual Style

Default slide style:

  • 16:9 aspect ratio
  • Background: white or very light gray
  • Font: one sans-serif family throughout
  • Title: 32-40 pt, sentence case, specific takeaway
  • Body: 20-26 pt, sparse bullets
  • Footer: slide number, short project name, optional date
  • Accent color: one muted blue/green/red; use it only for emphasis
  • Layout: align to a consistent grid; keep margins stable
  • Figures: large enough to read, centered or right-weighted with takeaway text on the left

Avoid:

  • Dense paragraphs
  • Decorative gradients
  • Too many colors
  • Screenshots with unreadable text
  • Vague titles like "Results" or "Method"
  • Unexplained abbreviations

Stage 4: Define Slide Page Types

For each slide, choose one page type:

  • Title slide: title, subtitle/project context, name, affiliation, date. For advisor meetings, include meeting goal.
  • Context slide: 2-3 bullets explaining why the audience should care.
  • Question slide: one explicit research question or decision question.
  • Method slide: diagram first, minimal equations, call out only the moving parts needed for the result.
  • Experiment setup slide: dataset, baselines, metrics, variables, and protocol.
  • Result slide: figure/table + one takeaway sentence + short interpretation.
  • Failure/blocker slide: what failed, evidence, attempted fixes, and what input is needed.
  • Decision slide: options, tradeoffs, recommendation, question for advisor/audience.
  • Next steps slide: 3-5 concrete actions with timeline.
  • Backup slide: extra details for likely questions.

Stage 5: Build the Slide Plan

For each planned slide, write:

  • Slide number
  • Slide type
  • Takeaway title
  • Visual/evidence needed
  • Main bullets
  • Speaker note: what to say in 20-40 seconds
  • Risk: what might confuse the audience

If a slide has no takeaway, merge it, cut it, or turn it into backup.

Stage 6: Produce the Artifact

Save to ~/phd-log/presentations/YYYY-MM-DD-[deck-name]-deck.md.

# Research Slide Deck Plan — [Deck Name]

## Context
- Audience:
- Time limit:
- Goal:
- One takeaway:
- Deck archetype:

## Reusable visual style
- Aspect ratio:
- Background:
- Font:
- Accent color:
- Footer:
- Figure style:

## Slide plan
| # | Type | Takeaway title | Visual/evidence | Speaker note | Risk |
|---:|---|---|---|---|---|

## Required figures / assets
- [ ] [figure/table/diagram]

## Advisor or audience decision points
1. [Decision/question]

## Backup slides
- [Backup topic]

## Final slide checklist
- [ ] Every slide has a takeaway title
- [ ] No slide has more than one main job
- [ ] All figures have readable labels and captions
- [ ] Experimental setup appears before results
- [ ] Blockers include attempted fixes
- [ ] Next steps are concrete and time-bounded

Tone

Act like a research communication coach. Be opinionated about structure and clarity, but adapt the deck to the audience. The goal is not beautiful slides in isolation; the goal is slides that make the research conversation easier.

What Not to Do

  • Do not start with colors or aesthetics before the story and audience are clear.
  • Do not let the user make a deck of status bullets without evidence or decisions.
  • Do not accept generic slide titles.
  • Do not force a conference-talk narrative onto an advisor update; advisor decks should surface uncertainty and decisions quickly.
  • Do not overpack slides because the user is afraid to leave things out. Move detail to backup.